• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Recent content by Osjur

  1. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

    Well then your equation is wrong because its giving too much value to SMT. I'm pretty sure that 16c / 16t TR will be faster than 1920x in all workloads, unless AMD somehow (magically) increased SMT performance so much that its actually giving over 35% perf. increase per core. That is also the...
  2. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

    Wohoo, you bring couple of cases where you show that 7900X can win against 12C 1920X. I never even argued that it couldn't. My line clearly says that 7900X is a bit faster (3%) than 1920X when using avarages (according to the review you chose) but I guess you didn't bother to read that. But why...
  3. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

    No, It seems you didn't read the hardware.fr review. It actually proves my prediction and makes your look silly (and completely wrong). Yes, 7900X is tiny bit faster than 1920X when comparing across multiple programs, where some of the programs can't utilize all those threads properly...
  4. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

    No, you are reading it wrong. Stock clock scores with my math: i9 7900X Score: 2200p i9 7960X Score: 3168p (math to get this score: 2200p * 1.6 * (3.6/4.0) TR 1950X Score: 2900p (math to get this score: 3400p * (3.5/4.1) Second math...
  5. O

    Skylake Xeon benches

    My beloved C-ray... I don't even care about that program but I posted it because it had the biggest win for AMD :LOL: And you could have posted those total throughput graphs as well. There's a reason why I quoted those lines from article. Perf. per Core is important but there are lots of other...
  6. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

    Yep, around 20% difference when comparing against stock 7900X @ 4Ghz all core turbo vs stock TR 1950X @ 3.5Ghz all core turbo. But when we compare against 16c 7960X, performance gap drops to ~9%. And as we know, there is no such thing as 16c / 32t Core i9 with 4.0Ghz stock all core turbo...
  7. O

    Skylake Xeon benches

    You could have posted the link to review... https://www.servethehome.com/dual-amd-epyc-7601-processor-performance-and-review-part-1/ And please, your bias is showing a lot. Posting charts of only perf / per core in a multi-socket & core environments :whistle: Lets counter with only one pic...
  8. O

    AMD Ryzen 16 Core “Whitehaven” Enthusiast CPUs Leaked – 3.6GHz Clock Speed, Boatloads of Cache & Qua

  9. O

    AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Smashes 5.2GHz Barrier On LN2

    Wrong. It doesn't say anywhere that its gonna be 1-core boost. And we know that Ryzen boosts 2 cores to max XFR. I'm more inclined to believe its gonna be 4-core turbo at 4.2Ghz with Threadripper because 2-dies. Epyc is max boosting with 12 cores.
  10. O

    Intel's 8th Generation Core Family - Coffee Lake (LGA 1151, 6C/12T)

    Good... very good :vamp: Now lets hope Intel isn't greedy and prices 8700K under 7800X to make things more interesting. But this is Intel we are talking about... :cautious:
  11. O

    R5 1600 vs i7-7800X 30 Game Showdown

    You mean earlier revision... :whistle: The chart I posted is from 7820X review... which was published two days ago. But I don't really wanna continue this this back and forth bickering. The biggest problem comes from mobo makers as there's a huge skeleton in the closet in the form of "stock...
  12. O

    Skylake-X (Core i9) - Lineup, Specifications and Reviews!

    So we have have Xeon-SP Gold 6154 with 3.7Ghz all core turbo and 205w TDP and then we supposedly have i9-7980X with 4.2Ghz turbo and 165w TDP. I'm just gonna say it: 4.2Ghz Turbo 2.0 is going to be for 2 cores max and all core turbo is going to be in the ballpark of 3.3-3.4Ghz just by looking...
  13. O

    R5 1600 vs i7-7800X 30 Game Showdown

    It is a funny thing that I did not say a word about Ryzen's TDP on my post but you are still bringing it up all the time. As someone has pointed out already: TDP does not equal to WATTS. You are also saying that Toms measured 250w watts after overclocking but when I am seeing this chart, I...
  14. O

    R5 1600 vs i7-7800X 30 Game Showdown

    Just gonna leave this here: Notice how certain 10 core is adhering its rated TDP value and the other 10 core is not.
  15. O

    Intel's 8th Generation Core Family - Coffee Lake (LGA 1151, 6C/12T)

    https://www.eteknix.com/intel-coffee-lake-hexacore-lineup-leaked/ Sooo... what the hell, I was expecting higher turbo clocks (at least 4.5Ghz) judging from what -Sweeper_ has been hinting for a while now. 4.3Ghz single and 4Ghz all core is :meh:. Oh well, hopefully it behaves like Kaby and...
See more
Back
Top