Recent content by acti0n

16:9 is best for most competitive games due to the greater FOV. You're at a disadvantage in most FPS and RTS games (like SC2) if you go 16:10.

Are you sure? That's REALLY grainy.

This seems to be the case with 90% of the displays Dell ships. It's like they just don't care. It's also one of the reasons I'm hesitant to pull the trigger on any Dell display--I'll likely have to exchange it multiple times before hopefully getting one that's acceptable. If this process goes on...

TFT Central says it's light.

Frame skipping?

Yup. Reminds me of the whole LG thin bezel fiasco: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS96RjxxU7A

That was my first thought too.

The only difference I can seem to find is the % color gamut on Dell's website. The P2414H has 86% color gamut listed, while the P2314H only has 83% color gamut.

I have zero tolerance for dead pixels, so I could never order a Monoprice monitor until they improve their policy.

After reading the P2414H review at http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_p2414h.htm, I was wondering if the P2314H shares the same qualities (e.g. PWM-free). There's a $50 difference in price between the 2, but the only apparent difference is 0.8" of screen size, which makes me wonder why...

I wonder how it compares to the P2314H.

Any more info on this display? This looks like a good non-grainy alternative to the popular 2412m.

Wish it had a better dead pixel policy. Just one ruins it.

Is there a version without speakers? I don't know what they were thinking putting speakers on these. It adds no value and simply cheapens the appearance.

Dell doesn't have a good warranty because they're a genuinely good company. They have a good warranty because it enables them to save money by cutting corners on quality control. They bet on most people not noticing or caring about defects. For the small percentage that do, it's a drop in the...