AORUS
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2017
- Messages
- 413
Could you please share your test results?
Again, care to share your results?
Simply impossible. Gsync produces less input lag than FastSync, unless your framerate is well, well above your refresh rate.
The what?! You are the one posting non-sense all the time. You have no idea how any of this technology works to the point that you are posting impossible, flat-earth like stuff. And, of course, no testing of any kind to back it up. As usual.
So you didn't even check the review. Nice of you.
Also, they did check FastSync while keeping the framerate equal to the refresh rate.
See a pattern there? Gsync has LESS input lag than Fast Sync. At the same time, Gsync has MORE input lag than being sync-less.
Clear as a day. Sync-less has less input lag than Gsync, which has less input lag than Fast Sync.
PS: if you want to see why they limit the framerate 2 frames below the refresh rate, this is why:
View attachment 67153
Horse shit. Pure and simple.
Another chart Pure and simple marketing crap that makes more money out of the consumers, type in google ' Graphics benchmarker cheats' they both have don't it NVidia and AMD. also google 'Why Do We Need 120Hz/144Hz Monitors If The Human Eye Can't See Beyond 60Hz?' it's the brain, not the eye, does the seeing. Pure and simple and seeing with the brain is often called 'imagination,'
The truth hurts the manufacturers pocket
Last edited: