Grimlaking
2[H]4U
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,245
Awesome move man either one you would have been happy with. Enjoy the driver/bios/os update dance until they get it ironed out! I'm too old for that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would right now pull the trigger on AMD and get more cores. Newest info seems to proof it can keep pace with the 7700k when paired with fast RAM...which right now is still a bit of fumbling and tweaking but we can expect better Bios' and faster RAM support, 3600 and faster seems to be a sweetspot for the Ryzen when it comes to gaming.
1700 AMD, add a decent cooler, AIO or CustomLoop, some fast RAM and you should be fairly future proof
I wouldn't call it that bad. It's just deficient in gaming at 1080p. In 1440P and higher there is a much smaller gap, sometimes none at all. The big difference between this and the FX is that this can actually exceed Intel's offering when it comes to some productivity applications unless you wanna splurge on Intel's $1000 processors.But it cant. Its like buying an FX and claim it will be fine if you wait long enough.
I wouldn't call it that bad. It's just deficient in gaming at 1080p. In 1440P and higher there is a much smaller gap, sometimes none at all. The big difference between this and the FX is that this can actually exceed Intel's offering when it comes to some productivity applications unless you wanna splurge on Intel's $1000 processors.
Exactly, that's how I upgraded my MSI board to semi modern.Buy 6 core Xeon for under $100 on ebay.
Get an SSD (even at half speed, it is a night and day difference between a mechanical drive)
Add another 12 gigs of ram (so 18 total)
Overclock Xeon to 4.2Ghz (or more)
For about $250, you will have a system that keeps pace with pretty much any modern configuration.
The real knock against LGA1366 is the lack of USB3 and Sata 6, both of which can be added in via PCI-E card.
I did that on mine, but went with a higher model. Have three 256 gig SSD's in Raid 0 running at 6g/s. I did that disk drive bench test before and after, the results are laughable. On my old on board controller I barely had any benchmark line, but on the new hardware add in controller in raid 0 it's just under the best SSD's listed in reviews on various sites, and games, especially anything that loads or changes zones, is instant, whereas before I could go cook a 6 course meal waiting for LotRO zone changes to load.Have you considered an add in card to get your SSD's running at 6gbs? Think I paid about $80 for mine last year, and the difference was night and day vs the on chip (x58) sata controller.
I had a I7-920 DO about 3 years back and I had 12GB of RAM - in tri-channel 3x4GB. It was overclocked to 4.0 Ghz.
I sold it to a bud and bought a I7-4770K and overclocked it to 4.0Ghz initially. (now overclocked to 4.5GHz)
I couldn't tell the difference in general use or gaming between the two systems, except the newer setup booted to windows faster since the X58 board I had was pretty slow to post. Once in windows - no noticeable difference.
Seeing the reviews lately at anandtech, tomshardware, and here, your looking at like a 20% upgrade or thereabouts in general going from a I7-920 overclocked to 4.0Ghz to something newer. If that's worth it to you - then so be it. In hindsight it wouldn't be worth it to me, unless I was just wanting to play with something new --- which is where I was. (I'm in the tech industry and it feels wrong somehow to keep tech longer than about 3 years, when your peers are upgrading all the time.)
My friend I sold that rig to brought it to a LAN party in the last six months with an upgraded graphics card in it - a 1060 IIRC. I used his PC for a bit in windows while he was there, and it felt snappy as ever with a SSD in place.
Realistically I agree with some of the others here ---
Buy an SSD like the mx300 from corsair for like $70 bucks off ebay and use it as an OS drive, put in three 4GB sticks of RAM for next to nothing off ebay to continue to utilize the tri channel, buy a compatible hex core off ebay, overclock to an easy 4.0 Ghz with a Corsair H80i v2, and buy a new graphics card like a Fury X or a 1070 if you consider your gaming is too slow at 1440p. Enjoy what you have for another few years - it has plenty of merit for that. The CPU isn't likely to be any kind of bottleneck you could actually appreciate, and the hex core might give you a bit more flexibility than a new quadcore - or at least equitable. The X58/socket 1366 has been probably the single longest lasting, most viable platforms that ever came out in PC hardware - I'm not sure there is anything even close. I.E. That I7-920 came to light in 2008, and overclocked to 4.0Ghz, doesn't give much up to the newest stuff in 2017 in real world use. (not talking about synthetic benchmarks)
The hard part there, and why I'm holding off till next year to see new stepping stone and revisions, is the brand new AMD boards for Ryzen are no where to be found, and need out of the box bios updates in a lot of the cases.Well guys, I made a choice. There was a deal on ebay on the Ryzen 1700 + 8% ebaybucks, and went for that. Now I have to slowly sort all the other details.
Almost went with 7700k, but I play at a resolution of 1440p, some frame loss can be improved with ram, it will be a good multi task machine. I did not see point of going from a quad-core to another quad-core.