New build. Temps OK?

[Williamea]

Just finished my new build this past weekend and wanted to know how my temps were.
Have not OCed yet.

Mobo - Asus P8P67 Pro
CPU - 2500k
Ram - 8gb Kingston HyperX 1600
CPU cooler - Corsair A70 w/included A70 thermal paste.

This is after running prime for about 10 min. Low 27c / High 56c

 

[Undead46]

Yea, you're perfectly fine.

 

[Tsumi]

You have plenty of room for overclocking.

 

[haadij404]

useless without load temps (under prime95 or linx)

 

[Tsumi]

useless without load temps (under prime95 or linx)

He stated that 50-55 C was max temps after running ~10 minutes prime95.

 

[haadij404]

He stated that 50-55 C was max temps after running ~10 minutes prime95.

haha good catch

I might need glasses

 

[sirmonkey1985]

temps aren't bad but kind of all over the place. i would recommend double checking the temps with real temp which is made for intel processors and usually more up to date.

 

[Silent Knight]

Temp looks good.Try to push it to above 4GHz and re-check the temp.

 

[jm0990]

i would recommend double checking the temps with real temp which is made for intel processors and usually more up to date.

Is realtemp generally considered to be superior to coretemp?

 

[Silent Knight]

Is realtemp generally considered to be superior to coretemp?

Not really,they all read temperature data from the intergrated sensors.

 

[Williamea]

Here it is with Real Temp. Ran Prime for the same amount of time as before.
No real difference other than Real Temp is not listing the CPU speed like Core Temp did.

 

[adamt19]

So - nobody feels safe trusting the monitoring software provided with their motherboard, eh?

 

[Loafdogg420]

So - nobody feels safe trusting the monitoring software provided with their motherboard, eh?

Whichever is the lowest, is the one I trust!

 

[adamt19]

But a chipset/cpu/mobo maker would benefit from under-reporting, no?

you fry your shit, 'oops..gotta buy a new one'

 

[dd0512]

if the mobos read from the same sensors as external progs (core, realt), why are the results multiple degrees different? does someone not know how to convert f <--> c

 

[mannyman]

lol f to c is c X 9/5 +32 its easy