Sailor_Moon
Gawd
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 611
A real "sRGB native screen" would have a sRGB gradation out of the box and would perfectly covering sRGB color space in relation to the desired whitepoint. You will not find such a screen. Nevertheless: If you only want to work in sRGB there's nothing wrong in choosing a non WCG screen. With CCFL backlight you would also avoid some severe problems in using a colorimeter.I think there is still something slightly different about the colours when compared to a "real" sRGB native screen?
A fixed sRGB mode (like in the DELL) will deliver sufficient results when accurately implemented and paired with an appropriate electronic. A flexible color space emulation is even more precise. Depending on the implementation you will also have a real gamut mapping when emulating larger color spaces than the display color space (the NEC PA241W offers this kind of transformations).
One problem are drifts of the screen, particularly because of aging effects of the backlight. This effects non WCG screens too. Some high-end screens can update their gamut information used as basis for the color space emulation to avoid increasing deviations (see our upcomming Eizo CG 245W review).
In can only guess what DELL has done to avoid these dithering effects with a simple firmware update. My information was that the A01 screens are using an other panel revision that has a FRC implementation in the panel and not scaler (which means that it would be now the implementation of LG). But after seeing a screenshot of an older A00 panel I'm quite unsure about this. The firmware update could disable FRC for sRGB and AdobeRGB mode (look at dark tonal values - if you don't see slight temporal noise no FRC is used) or change FRC rate. But these are only assumptions.Hmm. I think you've said that with the U2410 (hardware A00 updated to firmware A01) the firmware update simply disables the FRC dither in sRGB / Adobe mode? D
Best regards
Denis
Last edited: