Dell 2010 Product Line

T

tdoran1

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
169
It now seems like we are now becoming very close to a significant number of Dell 2010 monitor product announcements.

Today Dell US posted on their web site:

E2010H 20-inch Black Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
E2210H 21.5-inch Black Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
E2310H 23-inch Black Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor

Above all new 2010 models.

As noted on TFT CENTRAL at the following URL:

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/18.htm#dell_2410wfp

Dell 2410WFP On Its Way Soon?

Also Dell's Chris M. has "hinted"about a UltraSharp 2710W . . .


Tim
 
Hey Tim, any new updates we should know about? I've seen a few posts here and there about hints but how about consolidating them in one place for my mind's sake =D Too much to remember when it scattered about.
 
Goddamn you Dell and you tempting me to spend more money! :mad:

Can't wait for the specs on these new lines of proper, 16:10, PVA/IPS monitors soon. :)

If all is well, my 2407WFP A04 may have a companion very soon...
 
So I guess the "P" prefix denotes "Professional" whereas it has the usual 16:10 aspect ratios and resolutions, along with the swivel/tilt/rotate stands.

I suppose it makes it easier to differentiate between the 16:9 (blegh) monitors and the 16:10 ones; following this trend, where does the 2209A fall within?
 
Everett1 said:
E2010H - http://accessories.dell.com/sna/pro...tdetail.aspx?c=ca&l=en&cs=cadhs1&sku=320-8245

E2210H - http://accessories.dell.com/sna/pro...l.aspx?c=ca&l=en&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&sku=320-8241

E2310H - http://accessories.dell.com/sna/pro...l.aspx?c=ca&l=en&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&sku=320-8243

Available on the Dell Canada site also.
Click to expand...

Eh, I don't want to sound elitist, but I'm not seeing anything compelling. They're all generic 16:9 TN panels with the standard DVI/VGA suite of outputs. There's nothing that stands out from all the other thousands of 16:9 TNs out there, not even price (actually, they all look overpriced for what they give you, especially the $300 E2310H which is a total ripoff). That's pretty disappointing for a brand new lineup.
 
Do the E series always fall in line with the Ultrasharps in terms of panels?

Tim posted that the 2410wfp would be IPS
 
Snowdog said:
All are listed in their specs as having TN panels:
Panel Type:
TN - Twisted Nematic
Click to expand...

King of Heroes said:
Eh, I don't want to sound elitist, but I'm not seeing anything compelling. They're all generic 16:9 TN panels with the standard DVI/VGA suite of outputs. There's nothing that stands out from all the other thousands of 16:9 TNs out there, not even price (actually, they all look overpriced for what they give you, especially the $300 E2310H which is a total ripoff). That's pretty disappointing for a brand new lineup.
Click to expand...

Don't mind the feedback and opinions from forum members here. Was only mentioning the panels be at the Canadian site also. :p
 
King of Heroes said:
especially the $300 E2310H which is a total ripoff
Click to expand...
Not disagreeing with you, but I want to make sure you know you are looking at the Dell Canada site, not the Dell US site. The monitor is under the Canadian pricing scheme, and the amount quoted is in Canadian dollars.
 
Last edited:
King of Heroes said:
Eh, I don't want to sound elitist, but I'm not seeing anything compelling. They're all generic 16:9 TN panels with the standard DVI/VGA suite of outputs. There's nothing that stands out from all the other thousands of 16:9 TNs out there, not even price (actually, they all look overpriced for what they give you, especially the $300 E2310H which is a total ripoff). That's pretty disappointing for a brand new lineup.
Click to expand...

The "E" series look like a line of environmentally friendly(er? ;)) monitors. [H] is sorta the wrong audience for this series :p.
 
I thought that was what the G series was for... you know, everyone going "green." I'm going green... green in the face from getting sick of all the "green" stuff.
 
fss69 said:
The "E" series look like a line of environmentally friendly(er? ;)) monitors. [H] is sorta the wrong audience for this series :p.
Click to expand...

It's just the economy series, eg E248WFP E228WFP, even the 2209WFP carried the 'E' at one point even though it is nominally an Ultrasharp model.
 
Dell if you are reading this, bring us a 1920x1200 IPS for <$600 and we will give you lots of money.
 
The best PC I ever bought was a 233mhz Dell then a 400mhz then a 800mhz then I stopped =)
 
2710 with an e-ips panel could be quite compelling depending on the resolution, features, connectivity, and input lag. Hmmm. A 27 incher with 2560x1600 resolution would be tight! And wth the right coupons/discounts, it might be worth splurging on.
 
vjcsmoke said:
2710 with an e-ips panel could be quite compelling depending on the resolution, features, connectivity, and input lag. Hmmm. A 27 incher with 2560x1600 resolution would be tight! And wth the right coupons/discounts, it might be worth splurging on.
Click to expand...

I don't see it happening though, not on a mass market consumer display. Text on 2560x1600 is pretty small at 30 inches. I think it would be too small (for most people) on a 27 inch.
 
If 27" came at a dot pitch to match the 2560 @ 30" I think 27" models would be a ton more popular than they are. They make a very nice "tweener" size, just that the 1920 resolution on them now dampens market enthusiasm. But that's just wishful thinking probably.

I personally hate the trend to 1080 22-24" displays. Won't touch those with a ten foot pole.
 
For a 2560x1600 27" inch display, you would need to sit less than 30.4 inches to resolve every pixel of detail. Sounds far enough for me, but I suppose some people don't like sitting that close to a monitor.
 
Better be 16:9 and not something arbitrary and used by no media like 16:10 and 5:4.
 
Anemone said:
I personally hate the trend to 1080 22-24" displays. Won't touch those with a ten foot pole.
Click to expand...

+1

FitzRoy said:
Better be 16:9 and not something arbitrary and used by no media like 16:10 and 5:4.
Click to expand...

If you want a monitor for "media", which has a broad definition of ratios anyway (one example: 3 different widescreen formats), go buy a TV. Give me more pixels vertically so I can read documents and [H] when I want. Though I have to agree, I preferred 4:3 to 5:4 but I am a strange one in that reguard.
 
Xcelerate said:
For a 2560x1600 27" inch display, you would need to sit less than 30.4 inches to resolve every pixel of detail. Sounds far enough for me, but I suppose some people don't like sitting that close to a monitor.
Click to expand...

I'd love it. I cannot stand using my 24" 1920x1200 on my secondary box after using my 30" er on my main box. I HATE big pixels.

I'd snatch up a 2560x1600 27"er in a heart beat. Text is fine to me, but I do sit rather close sometimes. Bring it. Ain't gonna happen, but bring it.
 
Brahmzy said:
I'd love it. I cannot stand using my 24" 1920x1200 on my secondary box after using my 30" er on my main box. I HATE big pixels.

I'd snatch up a 2560x1600 27"er in a heart beat. Text is fine to me, but I do sit rather close sometimes. Bring it. Ain't gonna happen, but bring it.
Click to expand...

I love appropriately sized pixels. To me 1920x1200 needs to be 25-27". I suppose that's why I love my 2209WA.
 
Senryo said:
+1
If you want a monitor for "media", which has a broad definition of ratios anyway (one example: 3 different widescreen formats), go buy a TV. Give me more pixels vertically so I can read documents and [H] when I want. Though I have to agree, I preferred 4:3 to 5:4 but I am a strange one in that reguard.
Click to expand...

Yep. I already have 16:9 TV. I don't want to go backwards from 1920x1200 for my computer monitor. Just like I wouldn't buy 1680x1050 "widescreen" 20" after years of using 1600x1200. The only interesting new Dell for me is the rumored 2410 and only if it is IPS and 1920x1200.
 
Snowdog said:
Yep. I already have 16:9 TV. I don't want to go backwards from 1920x1200 for my computer monitor. Just like I wouldn't buy 1680x1050 "widescreen" 20" after years of using 1600x1200. The only interesting new Dell for me is the rumored 2410 and only if it is IPS and 1920x1200.
Click to expand...

Highly unlikely (regarding a 2410 that is IPS and 1920x1200)
 
Senryo said:
If you want a monitor for "media", which has a broad definition of ratios anyway (one example: 3 different widescreen formats), go buy a TV.
Click to expand...

No. I use my TV and my monitor for my console/movie usage. 2 people can't use the TV at the same time. Sometimes the computer is all you have. It's absurd to use this line of arguing, you may as well be arguing for a taller than wide rectangle aspect, so long as it has more pixels than anything else. Aspects matter, and media creators don't want 50 million different kinds of frames.

Give me more pixels vertically so I can read documents and [H] when I want. Though I have to agree, I preferred 4:3 to 5:4 but I am a strange one in that reguard.
Click to expand...

First of all, aspect ratios have nothing to do with real estate. A 16:9 monitor can easily have more pixels than a 16:10 monitor. Take 1920x1080 vs 1680x1050 as an example. The reason nobody immediately came out with a 2133x1200 to "beat" the 16:10's that preceded them is because, ideally, you want 1:1 scaling on fixed pixel displays for the best image quality. Media is not and will not be made at 2133x1200, it's made at 1920x1080, thus it makes sense for monitors in a certain size class to match that exactly. If consumers understood that, they wouldn't be fixated on 1920x1123 or 1920x1200 or some other arbitrary bullshit with a few more physical pixels. I'm hoping someone comes out with a 2880x1620 or something at 26" so that certain people stop whining about having to take a measly 4% vertical hit in the 24" class to conform to the new aspect.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top