I'm running an E8400 just at 3.0 Ghz right now. I mainly use my computer for Cubase recording and production. The main limiting factor in Cubase is the CPU and I'm wondering if 64-bit XP is supposed to utilize the CPU better in general, or just enable the CPU to work more efficiently with larger quantities of memory?
I'm running XP 32 right now. I only have 2 gigs of DDR2 800 presently but this is because I'm not concerned about memory. Since I'm not, and Cubase doesn't need it, would XP 64 be worthwhile? Cubase is a clock-cycle hog mainly so if there's some chance of CPU resources being managed better by XP 64 overall, it might be good to upgrade.
I'm running XP 32 right now. I only have 2 gigs of DDR2 800 presently but this is because I'm not concerned about memory. Since I'm not, and Cubase doesn't need it, would XP 64 be worthwhile? Cubase is a clock-cycle hog mainly so if there's some chance of CPU resources being managed better by XP 64 overall, it might be good to upgrade.