jarman said:
Is it just me, or does anyone else NOT like the way these reviews are done. Comparing different resolutions and different AA/AF settings for different cards doesn't give me an accurate representation of exactly how much faster/slower one card is compared to the other.
I'd prefer to see tests run at equal settings for all cards. I know that some cards allow you to raise the res a bit, and have equal performance, but how does that help benchmarking?
And in this case, they even raise the resolution on the GT, but disable AA and AF, and compare it to a lower res run on the XL with AA/AF enabled!?!?!?
Doesn't provide any definitive answers for me.
....and now I'm veering dangerously off-topic