Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sykil said:PRO or GT? Do you mean PRO or XT?
burningrave101 said:The 6800GT is the faster of the two
Sc4freak said:Isn't the X800XT faster than the 6800GT?
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2044Sc4freak said:Isn't the X800XT faster than the 6800GT?
I'm sure he means the XT. The XL uses the XT core but the XL is a lower clocked version of the XT. The XL is about $100 less than the 6800GT.ScHpAnKy said:You mean the X800XL?
Damn, these model numbers are confusing.![]()
The XL also uses a .11nm fabrication process.Derrict said:I'm sure he means the XT. The XL uses the XT core but the XL is a lower clocked version of the XT.
Sc4freak said:Isn't the X800XT faster than the 6800GT?
Sc4freak said:Isn't the X800XT faster than the 6800GT?
gordon151 said:Well in the hardocp review the x800xl won out in all but two of the games used so I wouldn't say it's not the 6800gt's equal performance wise.
CastleBravo said:Thing is, it wins a little bit in some places and loses BIG TIME in Doom 3 (and thus all future games on the Doom 3 engine... remember how many Quake 1/2/3 engine games there were?).
The x800 XL is VAPORWARE right now, children. And the claimed MSRP has no bearing on what the street price will be. ATI claims the x800 XL will be out in February. They also claimed the x800 XT would be available in the middle of last year, and they are STILL hard to find in stores.
The XL is a great deal... IF it becomes available anytime soon and IF the price is at the claimed $300 point. Of course, 6800 GT prices have also been dribbling downward, and the XL is only better than the GT when it is $100 cheaper.
Bottom line is, both ATI and nVidia are greasy liars about availability and prices.
BloodRayne said:The reason if loses big time in Doom3 is the same reason why the 6800 loses bit time in HL2. Both games are sponsored by either ATi or nVidia and thjerfore have been optimized for their particular architecture.
BloodRayne said:Ok, but ATi did make a mistake selling a 12pipe card for the price of another 16pipe card. Also I was talking about the X800XL not Pro because of the 12 to 16 pipe difference.
I agree that the GT is a bit faster in the majority of games but I would hardly call the GT equal to the X800XT. Just like the GT is faster than the XL in the majority of games so is the XT compared to the GT.Sir-Fragalot said:The X800XL is about the speed of the GT in some areas but loses to the GT in quite a few instances. It's the X800XT that's on even ground with it. And in a quite a few cases the XT is a bit faster. And of course the X800XT-PE is on par and in many cases superior to the 6800Ultra.
The X800XL in stock form is NOT faster than the 6800GT nor is it it's equal. If the X800XT is it's equal and it's faster than the XL then how could it be the 6800GT's equal? Especially when the X800XT and the GT are about the same speed. Teh X800XL is a lower clocked version of the X800XT without the molex connector.
jloutz said:What about the looks of the output from the gt as well as the 2D. I have a 9800 pro and it just looks so much warmer and text is way clearer than any NVIDIA card I have had before it and believe me I have used almost all of them (tnt2, geforce, geforce2, geforce 4).
S_Z said:X800XL looks to be a great card, with performence close to the GT
Apple740 said:They are equal, according HardOCP's own review:
Comparing performance directly to the GeForce 6800GT PCI-Express we found that performance goes back and forth between games. Some are faster on the X800XL, and some are faster on the GeForce 6800GT.
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NzAw
CastleBravo said:Cards that exist always outperform those that don't. Win: 6800 GT.![]()
Incidentally, the title of the topic is "x800pro or gt," meaning 6800 GT, and the winner between those two is the 6800 GT.
Indeed stupid when someone buys a normal pro huh? How about 6000+ 3DMark05 stock cooled with a "normal" pro? Last I checked thats better then an XT PE and GT.Apple740 said:Not if the Pro is a ProVivo, which can easily be flashed to 16pipes. It's indeed "stupid" when someone buys a "normal" Pro nowadays, while ProVivo's are in good quantity's out there.
Gavinni said:Indeed stupid when someone buys a normal pro huh? How about 6000+ 3DMark05 stock cooled with a "normal" pro? Last I checked thats better then an XT PE and GT.
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=853079
jloutz said:What about the looks of the output from the gt as well as the 2D. I have a 9800 pro and it just looks so much warmer and text is way clearer than any NVIDIA card I have had before it and believe me I have used almost all of them (tnt2, geforce, geforce2, geforce 4).
Not in 3DMark05 ^_^TehQuick said:Are u saying that's a norm? there are GT's that oc to Ultra Extreme speed and beat any GT and XT-PE.. but they are very few
Indeed stupid when someone buys a normal pro huh?
Yea tried it about 4 months ago =( took about 40 minutes to solder a thin string of wire between the two contact points, when I flashed it still said 12 pipes, but I got mad artifacts, I redid the solder job but scratched the tips of the points this time, same thing. Just bad pipes =( it's doomed to be 12 pipe forever.Apple740 said:Your's is special.![]()
![]()
Btw, have you tried a hardmod to 16pipes yet?