• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

X300 mobile

E

ekorazn

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
452
Just wondering, what last generation card is the X300 comparable too (ex. 9600, 5200, etc.)?

And how big of a performance gain is 128mb over 64mb? I was "absent" in computer gaming hardware, so I kind of lost some concept. Thanks in advance.
 
Well a X600 is comparable to a 9600. So what ever generation came before the 9600, is what im guessing the X300 is comparable to.

If you are planning on to game on a X300, I would advise you not get this card. I have a X600, and I run low settings on all newer games. I can do high settings in Source surprising but no AA or AF. Far Cry I can get medium settings. Any other game that is on the newer side, is all low settings.

I dont know how much an advantage having 128mb over 64mb would be on a X300. I would just go for the 128mb version.
 
i have it currently on my dell 6000 its really a uped version of a 9200 its really a "9300" cuz x means 10 so its the radeon10300 = x300 and the x600 means 10600 which would be like the 9600 and so on x700 ect...its ok...i can play bf2 all low but overall i think there need to be a better one like the x550
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top