x1900xt vs 7900gto?

Well, according to benches the X1900XT is much faster then the GTO and GTX... I just ordered a GTO but then saw that the X1900XT was faster in a lot of games. I'll order again when I see what the consensus says.

I also don't see myself going DX10 for a while. Especially since I just purchased MCE....
 
Please do not add 16 questions marks after your thread title to draw attention to it. You got my attention, but not in a good way.
 
Which company do you prefer??? I like Nv so ima say Nv's card. All the ATI guys will say ATI. Its a pretty biased question not knowing a single detail on how it will be used, etc, etc......

Solo
 
If you want to run at stock speeds, get the 1900xt. If you want to overclock get the GTO.
 
i'll take X1900XT and overclocking, please :D .

the question can be bias to some users but there are users, like myself, that have tried same generation cards from both camps and i just like ATi better due to IQ.
 
The GTO is pretty much the best bang for the buck. It keeps up with the XT and it has more memory (which can be important for certain games). There are better card, but not in that price range.
 
PRIME1 said:
The GTO is pretty much the best bang for the buck. It keeps up with the XT and it has more memory (which can be important for certain games). There are better card, but not in that price range.
Click to expand...

256mb x1900xt :D about the same price but then again many will say "dude thats 256mb missing i need it!!!"

so yea. it makes around and extra 5 frame difference . i would want 512mb as well.
 
also, depending on resolution you play on (and planned eye candy settings) the 512 will help with stuttering issues, one game being BF2 which I noticed a big difference in going from a 256 to a 512 card at 1600x1200 with even 2xAA enabled it made a difference
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top