Guru3d did a review on Wolfenstein and I thought the results were pretty amazing:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-page...-pc-graphics-analysis-benchmark-review,1.html
I had noticed that the GTX 980ti was up to 30% slower than the 1070 - two cards that are usually much slower. I figured it was the typical nVidia rot that we have seen with Fermi and Kepler.
Then I noticed the FuryX results.
Man that card got destroyed by an 8 gb 480. It seems that 8 gb might finally be necessary.
We have seen prior games "use" way more than 4 gb before, but this always seemed to be the game just using up the frame buffer. 4gb card didnt seem to take a hit, even at 4k.
Case in point:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Middle_Earth_Shadow_of_War/5.html
This game really NEEDS more than 4gb vRam. No doubt 8 gb will be the norm for even mid tier cards going forward.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-page...-pc-graphics-analysis-benchmark-review,1.html
I had noticed that the GTX 980ti was up to 30% slower than the 1070 - two cards that are usually much slower. I figured it was the typical nVidia rot that we have seen with Fermi and Kepler.
Then I noticed the FuryX results.
Man that card got destroyed by an 8 gb 480. It seems that 8 gb might finally be necessary.
We have seen prior games "use" way more than 4 gb before, but this always seemed to be the game just using up the frame buffer. 4gb card didnt seem to take a hit, even at 4k.
Case in point:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Middle_Earth_Shadow_of_War/5.html
This game really NEEDS more than 4gb vRam. No doubt 8 gb will be the norm for even mid tier cards going forward.