I'm purchasing a new computer and will be going with a Core 2 Extreme Quad-Core QX6700 overclocked to 3.20 GHz. I've chosen to stay with XP while also dual-booting to Linux.
My dilemma is that I'm waffling between XP Media Center Edition and XP Pro. The only reason I'm considering Pro is that it has "support for dual processors", but this could be a big deal. The reason I'm considering Media Center Edition is that, having read considerably on BeyondTV, SageTV and PowerCinema, XP Media Center seems to be superior.
But dual processor support will trump media capabilities. Can anyone offer a comparison, or provide a link, which will clarify how the two versions of XP perform and compare with the new quad core processors.
Some typical review statements that I've found : "...even Windows XP users may benefit some just from having the additional cores to run all those background tasks..." and "...the main benefit to an ordinary user from a multi-core CPU will be improved multitasking performance...ordinary users are already running many threads; operating systems utilize multiple threads as well as antivirus programs and other background processes including audio and video controls. the largest boost in performance will likely be noticed in improved response time while running CPU-intensive processes like antivirus scans, defragmenting, ripping/burning (requiring file conversion)...".
The above paragraph perfectly describes what I am aiming for in my new system - but this description does not indicate whether Pro has an edge over Home or Media Edition with the use of multi-core processors. I also work extensively with image and video files, which also shows improved performance with the new quad-cores.
I just need to decide which of the two versions of XP to go with. All comments are welcomed.
My dilemma is that I'm waffling between XP Media Center Edition and XP Pro. The only reason I'm considering Pro is that it has "support for dual processors", but this could be a big deal. The reason I'm considering Media Center Edition is that, having read considerably on BeyondTV, SageTV and PowerCinema, XP Media Center seems to be superior.
But dual processor support will trump media capabilities. Can anyone offer a comparison, or provide a link, which will clarify how the two versions of XP perform and compare with the new quad core processors.
Some typical review statements that I've found : "...even Windows XP users may benefit some just from having the additional cores to run all those background tasks..." and "...the main benefit to an ordinary user from a multi-core CPU will be improved multitasking performance...ordinary users are already running many threads; operating systems utilize multiple threads as well as antivirus programs and other background processes including audio and video controls. the largest boost in performance will likely be noticed in improved response time while running CPU-intensive processes like antivirus scans, defragmenting, ripping/burning (requiring file conversion)...".
The above paragraph perfectly describes what I am aiming for in my new system - but this description does not indicate whether Pro has an edge over Home or Media Edition with the use of multi-core processors. I also work extensively with image and video files, which also shows improved performance with the new quad-cores.
I just need to decide which of the two versions of XP to go with. All comments are welcomed.