meisterbrau
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2005
- Messages
- 183
3800 x2 @2.5 ghz
Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 50, Gen 0)
[12:26:44] Completed 300000 out of 500000 steps (60 percent)
[12:58:55] Writing local files
[12:58:55] Completed 305000 out of 500000 steps (61 percent)
[13:31:09] Writing local files
[13:31:09] Completed 310000 out of 500000 steps (62 percent)
[14:03:16] Writing local files
[14:03:16] Completed 315000 out of 500000 steps (63 percent)
[14:35:24] Writing local files
[14:35:25] Completed 320000 out of 500000 steps (64 percent)
[15:07:35] Writing local files
[15:07:36] Completed 325000 out of 500000 steps (65 percent)
[15:39:42] Writing local files
[15:39:43] Completed 330000 out of 500000 steps (66 percent)
[16:11:52] Writing local files
[16:11:52] Completed 335000 out of 500000 steps (67 percent)
[16:43:59] Writing local files
[16:43:59] Completed 340000 out of 500000 steps (68 percent)
[17:17:47] Writing local files
[17:17:47] Completed 345000 out of 500000 steps (69 percent)
[17:49:57] Writing local files
[17:49:57] Completed 350000 out of 500000 steps (70 percent)
[18:22:57] Writing local files
[18:22:57] Completed 355000 out of 500000 steps (71 percent)
[18:55:02] Writing local files
[18:55:02] Completed 360000 out of 500000 steps (72 percent)
[19:27:04] Writing local files
[19:27:05] Completed 365000 out of 500000 steps (73 percent)
[19:59:10] Writing local files
[19:59:10] Completed 370000 out of 500000 steps (74 percent)
[20:31:13] Writing local files
[20:31:13] Completed 375000 out of 500000 steps (75 percent)
32 minutes a frame.
edit -
ok marty - you're right. So that's 685 PPD. I was getting about 100 more PPD using VMware. But out of the 3 projects out there, 2610 seems to be getting the worst ppd, according to the stanford forums
Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 50, Gen 0)
[12:26:44] Completed 300000 out of 500000 steps (60 percent)
[12:58:55] Writing local files
[12:58:55] Completed 305000 out of 500000 steps (61 percent)
[13:31:09] Writing local files
[13:31:09] Completed 310000 out of 500000 steps (62 percent)
[14:03:16] Writing local files
[14:03:16] Completed 315000 out of 500000 steps (63 percent)
[14:35:24] Writing local files
[14:35:25] Completed 320000 out of 500000 steps (64 percent)
[15:07:35] Writing local files
[15:07:36] Completed 325000 out of 500000 steps (65 percent)
[15:39:42] Writing local files
[15:39:43] Completed 330000 out of 500000 steps (66 percent)
[16:11:52] Writing local files
[16:11:52] Completed 335000 out of 500000 steps (67 percent)
[16:43:59] Writing local files
[16:43:59] Completed 340000 out of 500000 steps (68 percent)
[17:17:47] Writing local files
[17:17:47] Completed 345000 out of 500000 steps (69 percent)
[17:49:57] Writing local files
[17:49:57] Completed 350000 out of 500000 steps (70 percent)
[18:22:57] Writing local files
[18:22:57] Completed 355000 out of 500000 steps (71 percent)
[18:55:02] Writing local files
[18:55:02] Completed 360000 out of 500000 steps (72 percent)
[19:27:04] Writing local files
[19:27:05] Completed 365000 out of 500000 steps (73 percent)
[19:59:10] Writing local files
[19:59:10] Completed 370000 out of 500000 steps (74 percent)
[20:31:13] Writing local files
[20:31:13] Completed 375000 out of 500000 steps (75 percent)
32 minutes a frame.
edit -
ok marty - you're right. So that's 685 PPD. I was getting about 100 more PPD using VMware. But out of the 3 projects out there, 2610 seems to be getting the worst ppd, according to the stanford forums