Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Windows 8
no windows aero , back to solid blocks ackkkkk , so xp ishhhh
no start menu , if it works dont fix it I dont care if its been on since 94
metro display built more for a tablet or phone than windows , ya now well all buy 24 inch touch screens , ya sure . . .
quicker boot . . . but um i have a ssd all ready , Placebo effect , cause either is fast
underneath the system is windows 7 , with a whole bunch of half witted ideas to take our money . . . till they fix them all again in windows 9 , and well pay again
First windows I'm passing up ,
You are trolling, right? Windows 8, the best OS there is?LOL, enjoy losing money. P.S. Enjoy your several-years-old computer, too... shame it won't run one of the best operating systems known to man, but the rest of us will try to wave to you limping behind...
Oh, and the Media Center Pack is not available for download yet either.
Where is Windows Media Center?
Windows Media Center is not preinstalled in Windows 8 Release Preview. If you want to use Windows Media Center, you need to add it by following these steps:
Swipe in from the right edge of the screen, and then tap Search.
(If you're using a mouse, point to the upper-right corner of the screen, and then click Search.)
Enter add features in the search box, and then tap or click Add features to Windows 8.
Tap or click I already have a product key.
Enter this product key: MBFBV-W3DP2-2MVKN-PJCQD-KKTF7 and then click Next.
Select the checkbox to accept the license terms and then click Add features.
Your PC will restart and Windows Media Center will now be on your PC and the tile will be pinned to the Start screen.
You think Win9 is going to magically go back to something?
Also how many of you have used it with a touchscreen?
Okay so beyond the start button now essentially being a full screen thing and a few minor cosmetic changes, what's the big deal? The desktop is still basically Win7? Some of you would just prefer the same product released over and over? Having used a Windows Phone for the last year I'm loving Metro and the new ecosystem and can't wait for the tablet.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-GB/windows-8/faq#
Will probably build a new machine in Jan/Feb, add a LEAP gesture device and Win8. No point in getting it until the LEAP is out for purchase.
But once it does, I can easily see myself swiping and stabbing the air in front of my monitor instead of using the mouse. Looking forward to it, actually.
BB
Love it while in midstream of my reply it posts and I can't edit....
Anyway, as long at the end of the day the OS does what I want it to do and things work pretty well I will be happy. So I don't have desktop.. ok fine, not a big deal as I can adapt.
I have been in IT for almost 20 years now and have seen much more drastic changes than this so this isn't such a huge crisis. And besides once 8 is released and things are optimized for it you may be suprised as to how much better it might than 7.
From what I hear (I don't have multi-monitors on this workstation yet) multi-monitor support is leaps and bounds better than 7.
After installing Classic Start Menu, and figuring out how to put the "real" My Computer icon onto the desktop, I'm finding this quite nice. It feels much faster than Vista SP2 (Win7), and this is just running in a VM!
Have to say that I'm totally hating the lack of real "MS" Start Menu, and totally despise Metro. If only it could be setup so that it goes to desktop mode as default!
Yeah, there was absolutely no reason to REMOVE functionality, especially since it is built on Win7. Metro should be an option, not a requirement that needs to be hacked around. Management at Microsoft has been brain dead these past few years. Wait for Win9.
Yea, dumbed down for the anemic arm architecture.
Windows 8 will only be good for tablets and phones. I seriously wouldn't even try or be bothered to try adapting it to a desktop. No point in getting it to look like windows 7 when we already have what we want. It's a step back to cater to what is just a toy fad. Tablets are still pointless.
Thats not to say everything is in this release. Microsoft recently announced that it recognizes the problems caused by switching between Metro and the traditional desktop UI and is working on a new theme that will bridge the gap between them. However, that theme is not included. Also, while there are many more apps available in this build, the full suite will not be finalized and fully polished until the product hits retail stores.
I wonder why Hardocp is recommending this OS. I see nothing for me here. Windows 7 will serve me well into the future.
?????
We recommend that you "head on over and grab Microsoft's latest try-before-you-buy version of Windows 8" ...you know, so you can see whether or not you like it.
Reading skills FTL.
Go buy a Wii or kinect if you want to experience that..you will find that gets old in about 10 minutes when your arm gets tired.
I love change when it is a positive improvement. I don't love change for the sake of change. Win 8 is change for the sake of change and represents a step backwards in user interfaces.
Worst of all, the traditional desktop is buried -- it's just another Metro app -- but there are still some things you can only do from the desktop, and some only from Metro. That means you have to switch between the two interfaces frequently. That's not nearly as smooth as it should be.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/micr...dows-users-to-figure-out-2012-5#ixzz1wZLvktO9
I'm curious to see how many people are actually planning on upgrading and making Windows 8 there next OS through thick-and-thin, or whether it'll be like Vista where after a few months/year people get so frustrated that they revert back to Windows 7.
I think the only reason why Windows Vista kept its 14-16% market share during its peak, was that more people were using it under x64 and the support for x64 was far better than Windows XP. At least that's why I stayed with Vista for 3 years.
The San Francisco Gate is not too happy with the release preview either. It would maybe be a great tablet OS, but users are forced out of Metro into the desktop to perform several regular Windows tasks, not even mentioning running third party software. This is really a half-baked OS.
SF Gate said:But unlike the iPad (and iPhone), which were immediately intuitive, Metro is not. A lot of the apps themselves are excellent, but as soon as you get out of the apps and into the "chrome" -- the interface of the actual operating system -- it gets weird.
SF Gate said:Worst of all, the traditional desktop is buried -- it's just another Metro app
SF Gate said:but there are still some things you can only do from the desktop, and some only from Metro. That means you have to switch between the two interfaces frequently. That's not nearly as smooth as it should be.
SF Gate said:In Metro, some functions, like opening an app or checking a checkbox, require just a tap. They actually won't work if you press down and click (like you would with a mouse). Others, like grabbing a slider to scroll, require you to click and hold with one finger, then move a second finger. Others require you to tap in a particular part of the screen, or swipe your finger from off the edge of the trackpad onto the trackpad. When you switch to the classic desktop, the functions change -- it's more like a traditional mouse, where you can click or tap. These problems may have been a result of using a laptop with trackpad, rather than a tablet -- but a lot of people are going to be using it this way, so the experience matters.
SF Gate said:The differences between Metro and the classic desktop seem jarring and random. The classic desktop is presented just another Metro app -- open it, and you're in familiar Windows 7 land, with a few useful updates. That's fine. But some functions of Metro still work: for instance, if you swipe from the right, you still get the "charms" that let you search the entire OS, share content, go to the Start menu, and so on. Others do not: if you do a hard click near the bottom, nothing. (In Metro, doing this takes you to useful functions like seeing all available apps, or pinning apps to the start menu.)
SF Gate said:The classic desktop is not well integrated with Metro. I wanted to pin MS Paint (which I use to take screenshots) to the Start menu, so I could easily get to it again and again. But even though Paint is a desktop-only app, I couldn't do it from the classic desktop -- I had to go back to the Metro Start screen, figure out how to open all apps (you hover over a spot near the bottom of the screen -- not easy!), then control-click (again, not easy!) and select "pin" from the bottom of the screen.
SF Gate said:One of the most common complaints from reviewers of early Windows 8 builds is that Microsoft removed the Start button from the classic desktop. This is indeed a pain. There's no easy way to find which apps are available to run on the desktop. The only way I could figure it out was to go back to the Metro start screen, then swipe up from the bottom of the screen to get the All Apps menu.
I'm curious to see how many people are actually planning on upgrading and making Windows 8 there next OS through thick-and-thin, or whether it'll be like Vista where after a few months/year people get so frustrated that they revert back to Windows 7.
I think the only reason why Windows Vista kept its 14-16% market share during its peak, was that more people were using it under x64 and the support for x64 was far better than Windows XP. At least that's why I stayed with Vista for 3 years.
You don't have to use Metro any more often than you had to click the start button before, it IS the start button now. If anything it's nicer because instead of searching a small rectangle at the bottom left of your screen for programs you have installed, you now have them all full screen to easily spot/see. People complaining about being forced to use Metro I'm pretty sure never complained about being forced to use the start menu.
LOL, enjoy losing money. P.S. Enjoy your several-years-old computer, too... shame it won't run one of the best operating systems known to man, but the rest of us will try to wave to you limping behind...
one of the best operating systems known to man
best operating systems known to man