Maybe I like staring at my start menu.
As I said, its more a personalization thing for me. I don't need 20 buttons and a huge menu when most of the time I only use four.
Sure, the classic all programs menu takes up more space, but unlike the new one I don't have to scroll down lists of shortcuts since it expands outward. I can see them all at once.
I have no problem with what you're saying Death, but when Ceruleun's statement doesn't hold up to scrutiny, unless you have a very shallow tree in programs, which would probably mean either very few programs or a ton of program groups.
I always opt for lots of grouping, because less grouping makes it a PITA to find programs that I don't use much....which is why I really wish we had vista at work...then i could use search to find them....I'd actually use that feature more at work than I do at home, because I use most of the programs I installed....at work, some may go unused for a year...then I'm struggling to figure out where the hell it is...or if it's installed at all
My other problem was resolution...how the hell would run Vista on a 1024x768 screen. The last time I ran at that resolution, I had a 14" CRT. IOW 1997!! On a 16x10 or 19x12, size is not an obstacle (regardless of which of the 3 start menus you choose). I guess it'd kinda matter on a laptop, but I think I'd prefer vista stlye even more if I had to use one of those god awful touch pads.