• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Why is mozilla more secure?

No ActiveX equivalent. Nothing is installed unless you request it. There's a 3 second delay on installing extensions so you don't click on install by accident.

Basically, just made harder to screw it up. There are bugs and holes in it, but they're being worked out.
 
Even more than the above, it's not part of the OS. Mozilla -- or any other third-party browser -- does not innately have permissions to rape the rest of your system.
 
lomn75 said:
Even more than the above, it's not part of the OS. Mozilla -- or any other third-party browser -- does not innately have permissions to rape the rest of your system.
haha thats awesome
and true
cool.gif
 
MeanieMan said:
Its also targetted less because of its small overall market %

woahh there buddy, i dont believe that to be so i seriously doubt that its hold on the market has any effect on security. Because if i was a hxr, i would definetly try and hack that just to see how easy or hard it would be. Also hxr's dont sit around thinking "Ok so lets hack something that has a big market share," I think its security relates to how it was developed, and the fact that it is not integrated with the OS.
 
locutus24 said:
woahh there buddy, i dont believe that to be so i seriously doubt that its hold on the market has any effect on security. Because if i was a hxr, i would definetly try and hack that just to see how easy or hard it would be. Also hxr's dont sit around thinking "Ok so lets hack something that has a big market share," I think its security relates to how it was developed, and the fact that it is not integrated with the OS.

There are holes in Firefox and Mac and the people you described are the ones that usually find them.

The people that stand to make money off of problems are the ones that go after market share. IE holds over 90% of web viewing, so thats who the adware people go after. Why would you pay programmers the big bucks if its only going to effect 5-8% of people that come across it?

They are programmed differently, but that alone doesn't make one better then the other. It has a lot to do with how popular you are, who is your user base, and who stands to profit from attacking you.

The firefox user base is much much different from the IE base. So even if firefox had adware problems, do you think the average firefox user would react the same way the average IE user would?

 
Back
Top