- Joined
- Sep 5, 2001
- Messages
- 11,476
Pentium D 2.8 dual core vs. s939 4000+ single core?
which is faster overall? I am going to say the Pentium D would be due to the 2 cores ..but not sure hence the question.
I have both with the an A8n-sli deluxe mobo w/2gb ram for the single core 4000+ vs the Pentium D 2.8ghz paired with an x-Acer micro atx mobo with SiS chipset w/onboard video but has a PCI-e slot.
I want to give one to my aunt to upgrade her Athlon XP 2600+ HP setup and I'll use her hard drive sb live soundcard and I'll give her an ATi x1600 vidcard for whatever setup I end up giving her ..
either setup is going to be an improvement for her and I would like to keep the faster setup for myself for a dedicated folding rig/recording studio computer for puting together music using my mbox and pro tools.
Quality wise , I like the Asus s939 setup personally and I could pick up an x2 chip down the road for it I suppose ... but would like to know what you guys think
which is faster overall? I am going to say the Pentium D would be due to the 2 cores ..but not sure hence the question.
I have both with the an A8n-sli deluxe mobo w/2gb ram for the single core 4000+ vs the Pentium D 2.8ghz paired with an x-Acer micro atx mobo with SiS chipset w/onboard video but has a PCI-e slot.
I want to give one to my aunt to upgrade her Athlon XP 2600+ HP setup and I'll use her hard drive sb live soundcard and I'll give her an ATi x1600 vidcard for whatever setup I end up giving her ..
either setup is going to be an improvement for her and I would like to keep the faster setup for myself for a dedicated folding rig/recording studio computer for puting together music using my mbox and pro tools.
Quality wise , I like the Asus s939 setup personally and I could pick up an x2 chip down the road for it I suppose ... but would like to know what you guys think