What's your opinion?

Brent_Justice said:
the 6600 will blow the x600 out of the water


I know I posted this thread asking for questions, but no ophense, but what the hell are you talking about?
 
laxman144 said:
I know I posted this thread asking for questions, but no ophense, but what the hell are you talking about?

you posted this question

I need everyones opinion on what they think is better?

and i gave you my opinion on what i think is better
 
PRIME1 said:
Plus you get SM3.0, FP16 HDR & Pure Video support.
Kind of useless on a 6600GT since its not fats enough to take advantage of those features.

By ya, the 6600GT is the better choice
 
Hate_Bot said:
Kind of useless on a 6600GT since its not fats enough to take advantage of those features.

By ya, the 6600GT is the better choice

he has a 6600 linked, not a 6600GT

but the 6600 would still be a lot faster than an X600XT

by default the fillrate is already higher, and if he overclocked it you'd get higher gains since it's an 8 pipeline card, the X600XT is 4 pipelines
 
Brent_Justice said:
the 6600 will blow the x600 out of the water

especially if you overclock it


ATI cards usually overclock much much much better than Nvidia.
 
its not a 6600gt, its a 6600

but i still think the 6600 is better than the x600xt because it overclocks a lot and performs pretty well in the first place
 
laxman144 said:
ATI cards usually overclock much much much better than Nvidia.

the 8 pipeline 6600 will gain more from overclocking than the 4 pipeline X600 XT

even at default speeds the 6600 has more fillrate, not to mention the better architecture
 
laxman144 said:
ATI cards usually overclock much much much better than Nvidia.
The x600XT will be lucky to get a 50-60MHz overclock using the stock heatsink. The 6600 generally overclocks 150-250MHz with stock cooling.
 
Back
Top