Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tetrahedron said:The human eye can see millions and millions of colors up around 10 million or so. It varies from person to person... so with the 'trickery' in use, I doubt many people can tell the difference in the colors of 16.2m versus 16.7m.
Tetrahedron said:The human eye can see millions and millions of colors up around 10 million or so. It varies from person to person... so with the 'trickery' in use, I doubt many people can tell the difference in the colors of 16.2m versus 16.7m.
Eva_Unit_0 said:true, but on the other hand people most certainly CAN see the difference between 262,144 colors (the REAL number of colors a 6-bit panel can do) and 16.7 million colors.
Tetrahedron said:yes they can, but the trickery 6-bit LCDs use to acheive 16.2m does work, cause it surely doesnt look like 262k to me. Cause most people can tell the difference between 262k and 16.x mill
Eva_Unit_0 said:problem is some displays seem to do this very poorly (i.e. 2007FPW), in which case people can notice the difference. I guess as long as the panel does a decent job of dithering it's okay.
xenogears said:What are you talking about? The 2007wfp is an 8 bit panel and is a freaking awesome monitor.
deanx0r said:I have had both type of panels.
There is a slight difference, but nothing dying over imo.
It all depends of the priorities however. If you are a design artist, then the 8 bits panel is for you. If you are a gamer and want minimum or no ghosting, then the 6bits is for you as they offer slightly better response time.
So, why does it matter 16.2 vs 16.8 when, for example, there's only
1920 x 1200 = 2.304 mil pixels?
Monty