• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

what would u prefere

OC_LeGeND

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
227
(1) 3.06GHz Intel Mobile Pentium 4 533MHz 478-pin FC-mPGA4 SL7NA (P4-M with HT?)

(2) 3.0E Intel Pentium 4

(3) 3.4Ghz Intel P4 (northwood)

what would be the better overclocker and have better performance?
 
Number 2. Bet it would OC equal to or higher than the northwood will, plus be a whole lot cheaper.
 
I say the Northwood too. Only b'c the frontside bus should be higher than the mobile pentium. The Prescott is a bit behind in clock speed, doesn't have much (if any) performance increase over a similarly clocked Northwood, and I believe it runs hotter than the Northwood.

So, option 3 ftw.
 
My last CPU was a 3.4C and I was able to overclock to 3.8GHz on air. Definately a capable chip.

Para
 
although, after all this conroe talk, a 12% overclock just doesn't seem to cut it ;)
 
brucedeluxe169 said:
prescott... high end air will crank that to 4.0

Depends on the stepping, my 3.0E C0 will only do 3.375 stable with a Thermaltake Tower 112 Pure Cu and dual 90mm fans on it.

Edit, i'd rather own a 3.4C w/HT but too expensive for my tastes when kentsfield is just around the corner.
 
i was considering the northwood since its clocked 3.4Ghz maybe hoping 4.4Ghz or so from it

number 2 i have now i cant go no higher then 280x15 = 4.2Ghz on air, i`d believe i`d benifit from a higher multi with this mobo

but wouldn`t the 512 L2 cache be a slower performer up agianst its prescott brother who has a 1024 L2
 
OC_LeGeND said:
i was considering the northwood since its clocked 3.4Ghz maybe hoping 4.4Ghz or so from it

number 2 i have now i cant go no higher then 280x15 = 4.2Ghz on air, i`d believe i`d benifit from a higher multi with this mobo


You got phase change man? Those are pretty optimistic numbers. If you can get 25% that's a pretty damn good OC. 3.0 @ 4.2 = 37.5% :eek: 3.4 @ 4.4 = 29%


OC_LeGeND said:
but wouldn`t the 512 L2 cache be a slower performer up agianst its prescott brother who has a 1024 L2
no, the cache isn't an issue becaus there was a pretty good change in arcitecture between the two different cores. I think Prescott was a 31 stage pipeline and Northwood was only 20. Or something like that.

In my personal experience, the higher clocked Northwoods have a little lower OC ceiling than the prescots. Which is why i recommended the prescott. Just my personal experience though.
 
pigpen said:
You got phase change man? Those are pretty optimistic numbers. If you can get 25% that's a pretty damn good OC. 3.0 @ 4.2 = 37.5% :eek: 3.4 @ 4.4 = 29%
phase change probally wouldn`t help much then agian im not sure what the max fsb is on this mobo and my memory is probally holding me back some to i tried 297x15= 4.4Ghz the computer posts then reboots and re posts agian in a circle
 
brucedeluxe169 said:
goddamn, prescott really was 11 more stages than northwood?

goddamn, why the hell did they do that...

To gain more mhz, it was a mhz war back then. Conroe changed that.
 
OC_LeGeND said:
phase change probally wouldn`t help much then agian im not sure what the max fsb is on this mobo and my memory is probally holding me back some to i tried 297x15= 4.4Ghz the computer posts then reboots and re posts agian in a circle


looking at your super pi's, you're getting some throttling. I get 32s with a 3.2 @ 4.1ghz . so yeah, i think you could use better cooling.
 
Back
Top