Dec 30, 2006 #1 T tisb0b [H] Pirate Joined Aug 29, 2006 Messages 3,037 what would be better? 1. e6400@2.72 w/1.175v ram@850 (4:5 divider ie. 2.5) 2. e6400@2.8 w/1.2 ram@700 (1:1 divider)
what would be better? 1. e6400@2.72 w/1.175v ram@850 (4:5 divider ie. 2.5) 2. e6400@2.8 w/1.2 ram@700 (1:1 divider)
Dec 30, 2006 #2 A Arcygenical Fully [H] Joined Jun 10, 2005 Messages 25,066 I say clockspeed... But not by much lol.
Dec 30, 2006 #3 T tisb0b [H] Pirate Joined Aug 29, 2006 Messages 3,037 Arcygenical said: I say clockspeed... But not by much lol. Click to expand... I'll probably just finish running orthos on this 2.8ghz OC then I'll put it back to 2.72 because it runs about 2*C cooler I'm thinking I must've gotten some good ram if it happily runs 850mhz
Arcygenical said: I say clockspeed... But not by much lol. Click to expand... I'll probably just finish running orthos on this 2.8ghz OC then I'll put it back to 2.72 because it runs about 2*C cooler I'm thinking I must've gotten some good ram if it happily runs 850mhz
Dec 30, 2006 #4 Q quadnad Supreme [H]ardness Joined Oct 24, 2005 Messages 7,656 You could use something like Prime95 to see which is quicker, although it isn't a comprehensive benchmark.
You could use something like Prime95 to see which is quicker, although it isn't a comprehensive benchmark.
Dec 30, 2006 #5 T tisb0b [H] Pirate Joined Aug 29, 2006 Messages 3,037 quadnad said: You could use something like Prime95 to see which is quicker, although it isn't a comprehensive benchmark. Click to expand... well on 2.8 it failed after 2.5 hours so that decided it for me
quadnad said: You could use something like Prime95 to see which is quicker, although it isn't a comprehensive benchmark. Click to expand... well on 2.8 it failed after 2.5 hours so that decided it for me
Dec 30, 2006 #6 Q quadnad Supreme [H]ardness Joined Oct 24, 2005 Messages 7,656 tisb0b said: well on 2.8 it failed after 2.5 hours so that decided it for me Click to expand... lol, good stuff. i just realized I meant SuperPi in that post too. My god I've been absent minded a lot lately.
tisb0b said: well on 2.8 it failed after 2.5 hours so that decided it for me Click to expand... lol, good stuff. i just realized I meant SuperPi in that post too. My god I've been absent minded a lot lately.
Dec 30, 2006 #7 T tisb0b [H] Pirate Joined Aug 29, 2006 Messages 3,037 quadnad said: lol, good stuff. i just realized I meant SuperPi in that post too. My god I've been absent minded a lot lately. Click to expand... I did run Super PI and the differences were neglible so I guess thats a good thing
quadnad said: lol, good stuff. i just realized I meant SuperPi in that post too. My god I've been absent minded a lot lately. Click to expand... I did run Super PI and the differences were neglible so I guess thats a good thing
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
