• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

What is the difference between...

dlenart

Weaksauce
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
90
<ol>
<li>AMD 4200 X-2 @2.2 GHZ</li>

<p> -or-</p>

<li>Pentium D 830 smithfield @3.0</li>
</ol>

<p>Besides the fact that the AMD is about $50 more expensive? Performance wise is there a big difference?</p>


<p>Thanks</p>
:confused:

Edit: Sorry for all the tags. I thought this was HTML compatible.
 
If you aren"t going to overclock the X2-4200 will be much better (as well as the X2-3800) then the Intel 930.
If you are going to overclock then its a toss up there hasn't been any real test to say which one will win just a lot of speculation
 
830 smithfield will be slower and run much hotter.

the 4200 should beat it easily stock vs stock or overclocked vs overclocked.

I don't know why you'd get an 830 when the 920's are cheaper and any motherboard that supports an 830 will support a 920 (though it might need a BIOS upgrade) And the 920 has more cache, and they overclock like crazy. most hit around 4Ghz on air.
 
chrisf6969 said:
830 smithfield will be slower and run much hotter.

the 4200 should beat it easily stock vs stock or overclocked vs overclocked.

I don't know why you'd get an 830 when the 920's are cheaper and any motherboard that supports an 830 will support a 920 (though it might need a BIOS upgrade) And the 920 has more cache, and they overclock like crazy. most hit around 4Ghz on air.


I don't know either...Probably cuz I haven't been looking at processors since I bought my Northwood two years ago... I thought a Pentium D was a Pentium D....But now I see there are 800 series and 900 series... So is the 800 series just an older version of the Pentium D or is it like a value brand Pentium D compared to the 900series?

Thanks for info...Is it me or does finding and understand an Intel chip seem much more complicated than finding an AMD?
 
mrweasel said:
800 series: old and busted, 90mm
900 series: new hotness, 65mm

800's, 2 x 1mb cache, 90nm old HOTness - literally very hot
900's, 2 x 2mb cache, 65nm new COOLness - run much cooler, and overclock much higher easier
 
Back
Top