now, is it just me, or does that seem bassackwards?
I mean, here you have a small cheap to produce core like the t-bred, and you replace it with a larger more expensive core like the barton, and cut half of it off and under clock the FSB.
This would only make sense if they were doing like they supposedly are doing with the 64 3000+, turning defects into budget CPU's.
I mean, here you have a small cheap to produce core like the t-bred, and you replace it with a larger more expensive core like the barton, and cut half of it off and under clock the FSB.
This would only make sense if they were doing like they supposedly are doing with the 64 3000+, turning defects into budget CPU's.