![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Happy Hopping
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Messages
- 7,848
Awhile ago, I read the spec. of their 100 to 300 mm lens as well as the 100 to 400 mm lens. I spotted something really wrong, in a way that if you compares to the 17 to 85 mm lens.
In other words, there is something that the 17 to 85 mm lens (the lower range lens) does, that these 100 to 300 mm lens does not do. It's some important. But now, I forgot what I found.
Does any1 know what are the features that the 100 to 300 lens does not have in compares to 17 to 85 mm lens? Needless to say, I am not talking about the mm range. I vaguely recall the 17 to 85 mm type lens does something automatic whereas the 100 to 300, 100 to 400 mm cannot do it.
In other words, there is something that the 17 to 85 mm lens (the lower range lens) does, that these 100 to 300 mm lens does not do. It's some important. But now, I forgot what I found.
Does any1 know what are the features that the 100 to 300 lens does not have in compares to 17 to 85 mm lens? Needless to say, I am not talking about the mm range. I vaguely recall the 17 to 85 mm type lens does something automatic whereas the 100 to 300, 100 to 400 mm cannot do it.
