• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Waterpath question

Z

Zoramac

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 5, 2003
Messages
403
My current setup is a DDC-12v pump, RBX cpu block and a Maze4 chipset. I just ordered a maze4 gpu block. My question is is there a large flow difference between the gpu and chipset block? if they are equal or if the chipset has a higher restriction, id like to have one output on the rbx go to the gpu and the other go to the chipset so that they run in parallel and then combine them to go back to the reservoir (cpu>gpu=chipset > rad>pump) . If there is more of a restriction in the gpu block i think it would be better to run in series (cpu>gpu>chipset>res>rad>pump). or would it be better to go chipset>gpu? Thoughts anyone?
 
I guess you could give it a try and see how the temps turn out, but generally running in parallel is not a good idea. You could pump to the graphics, then chipset, then CPU since your flowrate must be pretty good with that pump.
 
I actually asked DangerDen the same question (since i' m using all DD components) and just got this response back from them.

"The flows are equal and if you go to the RBX then have one outlet go to the GPU and the other to the Chipset would be a good Idea. In fact our Best R&D guy uses a RBX and does the same thing with a couple of Maze4 GPUs.
....................GPU
Pump-RBX< ....... >Reservoir-Radiator and back to the pump;)"
........ .... ....Chipset


Looks like ill give it a try this way and see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top