• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

VR-Zone HL2 Stress Test Benchmarks

Wow, nice to the the FX5950 taking a lead over the 9800pro with AA/AF. I wonder how the XGI V8 would do in HL2... Thanks for the link.
 
These benchmark seem a lot more reasonable than the others we have been seeing lately, thanks for the link
 
The "30% faster" rumor really isn't so far from the truth according to these benchmarks. Even with the beta drivers, the X800 XT stays 25% - 35% ahead of the 6800 Ultra. Without the beta drivers, the gap widens to about 30% - 40% when AA/AF are enabled.
 
I really hope I didn't make a mistake selling my x800 Pro. I have been very happy with my GT up to now and the CSS beta runs really well. I just hate to see the game I want to play more than any other game the next year be faster on another card.

Anyone think an XT-PE will be available by early October? ;)
 
FluxCap said:
I really hope I didn't make a mistake selling my x800 Pro. I have been very happy with my GT up to now and the CSS beta runs really well. I just hate to see the game I want to play more than any other game the next year be faster on another card.

Anyone think an XT-PE will be available by early October? ;)

Well that's what you get for selling your card because of "OMG LOLZORS DOOM 3 BENCHIES!#@$@" :D

Seriously though, either card is going to perform VERY well in ANY of the games. So what if there's a 10FPS difference between the cards, they are still pulling 50+ FPS at very high resolutions + AA/AF settings.
 
Stanley Pain said:
Well that's what you get for selling your card because of "OMG LOLZORS DOOM 3 BENCHIES!#@$@" :D

Seriously though, either card is going to perform VERY well in ANY of the games. So what if there's a 10FPS difference between the cards, they are still pulling 50+ FPS at very high resolutions + AA/AF settings.
Last night when playing CSS beta my frames per second dropped from 70 to 35 when I ran through a smoke grenade, not good!

Do the ATI cards have this issue?
 
With my 6800GT (running on my 2700+ system still) and OCed to 420/1100 i get the following on the stress test :

1280x960, 4aAA, 8xAF, max everything, drivers from the nvidia site (not beta) : 95.0FPS (what i play at)
1024x768, same as above : 106.8FPS
1600x1200, same as above : 76.2FPS

Anything above 70fps is academic to me, i really dont see where the problem is in having a 6800 or an X800, both are going to play games well.
 
trinketsummoner said:
With my 6800GT (running on my 2700+ system still) and OCed to 420/1100 i get the following on the stress test :

1280x960, 4aAA, 8xAF, max everything, drivers from the nvidia site (not beta) : 95.0FPS (what i play at)
1024x768, same as above : 106.8FPS
1600x1200, same as above : 76.2FPS

Anything above 70fps is academic to me, i really dont see where the problem is in having a 6800 or an X800, both are going to play games well.
Nice numbers! I guess I am going to just forget 1600x1200 with my GT in HL2 until some driver tweaks come out in the next 6 months. While I get 53fps in the VST, in CS:S you will get killed when a firefight starts and/or there is a smoke grenade because it drops to the 20s.
 
Oh yes, make sure Vsync is off when you run the test, it makes a HUGE difference to your FPS numbers.
 
trinketsummoner said:
Oh yes, make sure Vsync is off when you run the test, it makes a HUGE difference to your FPS numbers.
Yeah, I always leave it off. I would be afraid to see what happens if I turned it on. :D
 
Back
Top