RugenNixie
Weaksauce
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 123
I'm currently in a discussion with others at my company about expectations of our virus protection software. We use Symantec server-based virus protection. We have a computer located in a common area that uses a shared account (anyone can use it without using a personal log-in). There is also no management onsite at night, although operations are 24/7, and no limitations are in place to prevent someone from visiting the worst sites on the internet. This computer routinely must be taken out of service and cleaned of viruses. Symantec shows that viruses are being discovered and deleted on a regular basis, but over time one or more will overtake the computer or the virus protection. Virus definition files are updated every night and scans are run every day.
The expectation from management is that the virus protection should find and delete all viruses without a need for any intervention from IT. I believe that the virus protection should not be expected to be a guarantee, especially not when there is nothing to prevent people from visiting the worst sites on the internet.
What are our experiences? Can you bullet proof a computer by using virus protection alone?
In case anyone wants to ask. No, I am not allowed to add any limitations to this computer other than the virus protection.
The expectation from management is that the virus protection should find and delete all viruses without a need for any intervention from IT. I believe that the virus protection should not be expected to be a guarantee, especially not when there is nothing to prevent people from visiting the worst sites on the internet.
What are our experiences? Can you bullet proof a computer by using virus protection alone?
In case anyone wants to ask. No, I am not allowed to add any limitations to this computer other than the virus protection.