the.ronin
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 508
I just wanted to get some clarification on the benefits of using a separate RAID controller card versus the motherboard controller or software RAID (e.g., Windows 7 mirroring).
I plan on setting up RAID 1 between 2 hard drives purely as a backup solution for files not for OS redundancy and uptime assurance. The OS (Windows 7 Pro x64) will sit on a separate, single drive.
With a separate RAID controller card:
* If I were to change the motherboard for whatever reason, I can just plug in the controller card and expect my array to be intact.
* If I were to change the OS (upgrade, re-install, etc.), I can expect my array to be intact.
* If one of the drives become compromised, it will alert me after the post screen.
* At any time, I can remove either drive from the array, connect it to another computer and access the files on the drive. (Granted, I may corrupt the original array that way.)
Of course there may be varying degrees of caveats all of these assertions, are they generally accurate?
I plan on setting up RAID 1 between 2 hard drives purely as a backup solution for files not for OS redundancy and uptime assurance. The OS (Windows 7 Pro x64) will sit on a separate, single drive.
With a separate RAID controller card:
* If I were to change the motherboard for whatever reason, I can just plug in the controller card and expect my array to be intact.
* If I were to change the OS (upgrade, re-install, etc.), I can expect my array to be intact.
* If one of the drives become compromised, it will alert me after the post screen.
* At any time, I can remove either drive from the array, connect it to another computer and access the files on the drive. (Granted, I may corrupt the original array that way.)
Of course there may be varying degrees of caveats all of these assertions, are they generally accurate?