I have been running my machine for about one month now at ~ 3.5ghz (160x22)...stable based on prime 95. Running my memory at stock 1600 (160x10). This is all on air with no increase in default voltages. Rock solid stable.
But....I was finding it annoying to wait for the boot (seemed to take a long time), and it 'felt' like applications took a long time to respond to mouse input.
On a whim, I reset my bios to "optimized default", which ran the processor in turbo mode, ran the bclk at 133mhz, and set the multimplier at anywhere between 9 at idle and 26 at peak. It underclocked my memory at 1333mhz. Result: lightning fast boots, and nearly instantaneous response of applications to mouse click.
Hmmm....does this make sense? Bottlenecks somewhere?
While I did lose frames/second in certain applications, the pleasure of responsiveness is attractive. I'd like to have the power of both the responsivness and the frames from the overclock.
Bob
i7 860
Cooler Master Hyper TX3 hsf
Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P
G.Skill Ripjaws series 8 GB (4x2GB) ddr3 1600
G92 8800 GTS (512 mb) video
520 Watt Crucial modular power supply
But....I was finding it annoying to wait for the boot (seemed to take a long time), and it 'felt' like applications took a long time to respond to mouse input.
On a whim, I reset my bios to "optimized default", which ran the processor in turbo mode, ran the bclk at 133mhz, and set the multimplier at anywhere between 9 at idle and 26 at peak. It underclocked my memory at 1333mhz. Result: lightning fast boots, and nearly instantaneous response of applications to mouse click.
Hmmm....does this make sense? Bottlenecks somewhere?
While I did lose frames/second in certain applications, the pleasure of responsiveness is attractive. I'd like to have the power of both the responsivness and the frames from the overclock.
Bob
i7 860
Cooler Master Hyper TX3 hsf
Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P
G.Skill Ripjaws series 8 GB (4x2GB) ddr3 1600
G92 8800 GTS (512 mb) video
520 Watt Crucial modular power supply