• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

U.2 over SFF-8644?

chx

Gawd
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
698
So the U.2 connector is per Making Sense of Next-Gen SSDs this article is a "slightly modified" SFF-8643. I can't find a description of this "slight modification". Would SFF-8643 to SFF-8644 adapters work? In other words, is it possible to run PCI Express x4 via an PCIe-U.2 adapter followed by a SFF-8644 to SFF-8643 adapter and the other end another SFF-8644 to SFF-8643 adapter and then a U.2 to PCIe x4 slot? All of these adapters exist I am just wondering whether it would work.
 
So the U.2 connector is per Making Sense of Next-Gen SSDs this article is a "slightly modified" SFF-8643. I can't find a description of this "slight modification". Would SFF-8643 to SFF-8644 adapters work? In other words, is it possible to run PCI Express x4 via an PCIe-U.2 adapter followed by a SFF-8644 to SFF-8643 adapter and the other end another SFF-8644 to SFF-8643 adapter and then a U.2 to PCIe x4 slot? All of these adapters exist I am just wondering whether it would work.

It might. I don't know if the latency and signal strength loss added by the cable can be an issue - SAS accounts for these, PCIe probably doesn't. Do you have any particular application in mind?
 
They have those; I can't post links but google "pcie expander chassis". They come with a host card, an expansion card in the chassis, and usually two SAS-like cables for connectivity. It's pretty expensive though.

I don't think what you describe above would work for more than a single card.
 
As far as I know, the U.2 version of the cable has the requisite shielding to protect the integrity of the data and the integrity of treference clock (which must be present unless using a SRIS device).
 
Back
Top