Tomshardware contradicts itself..

You are looking at a benchmark at low ress and no AA. Try a 1920x1200 4xAA.
 
Good lord, Toms is still an actively read website?
That guy has been doing crap reviews since I joined this website 6 years ago, seems he is still as worthless as when he did his "Intel CPUs can run without heatsinks, AMD's catch on fire" crap. Sigh, some things really DON'T change.
 
The GTX has the fastest performance of the three, with a significantly higher price tag.

The GT or the GTS 512MB are currently the best value for the high-end at the $250-350 price bracket, and are only marginally slower than the GTX.
 
The GTX has the fastest performance of the three, with a significantly higher price tag.

The GT or the GTS 512MB are currently the best value for the high-end at the $250-350 price bracket, and are only marginally slower than the GTX.

Would 512mb be recommended for gaming at 1680x1050 with a little aa/af? i am never sure where the cutoff is, because you only need the more memory for higher resolutions, correct?
 
Back
Top