I'm being constantly surprised by comments about how bad TN lcds are (allegedly). Apparently TNs suffer from atrocious viewing angles, excessive backlight bleed, poor colors, (16.2M not 16.7M) and are often derided as bargain basement in terms of value
I bought a TN ( Acer 2216) 2 months ago and I'm very happy with it. I can see the whites go yellowish if you move right over to one side or the other, and see the brightness change from BRIGHT to normal to dark as you move from above the screen to below it, but so what?
WIth no ghosting, no input lag, a black black, and 22" of real estate at 1680x1050 for $330 it seems pretty good value to me and I'm surprised by these guys who claim they are in fact crap. HAs TN tech improved in the currwent generation? Were they once much worse?
Would anyone who has an 'old' TN lcd, and one of the new 22" TNS, please do a side by side and let us know if the problems apparently endemic in old TNs have been mitigated in the new generation
I bought a TN ( Acer 2216) 2 months ago and I'm very happy with it. I can see the whites go yellowish if you move right over to one side or the other, and see the brightness change from BRIGHT to normal to dark as you move from above the screen to below it, but so what?
WIth no ghosting, no input lag, a black black, and 22" of real estate at 1680x1050 for $330 it seems pretty good value to me and I'm surprised by these guys who claim they are in fact crap. HAs TN tech improved in the currwent generation? Were they once much worse?
Would anyone who has an 'old' TN lcd, and one of the new 22" TNS, please do a side by side and let us know if the problems apparently endemic in old TNs have been mitigated in the new generation