SonataSys
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 150
I have recently benchmarked three generations of disks configured in a RAID-0 array using a dual Xeon system running with an integrated SATA-I RAID controller.
I was expecting better performance numbers from the newest VelociRaptor array, but I suspect my older SATA-I controller is a bottleneck.
I would be interested in how this compares with other benchmarking efforts.
WD VelociRaptor 300GB (10,000 RPM) RAID-0 600GB Array
Analysis:
WD Raptor 74GB (10,000 RPM) RAID-0 148GB Array
Analysis:
Hitachi Deskstar 400GB (7,200 RPM) RAID-0 800GB Array
I was expecting better performance numbers from the newest VelociRaptor array, but I suspect my older SATA-I controller is a bottleneck.
I would be interested in how this compares with other benchmarking efforts.
WD VelociRaptor 300GB (10,000 RPM) RAID-0 600GB Array
Analysis:
- 24% improved average and max. transfer rates compared to the WD Raptor array
- 32% improved average and 29% improved max. transfer rate compared to the Hitachi Deskstar array
- Slight improvements in burst rate and CPU usage
WD Raptor 74GB (10,000 RPM) RAID-0 148GB Array
Analysis:
- 11% improved average and 7% improved max. transfer rate compared to the Hitachi Deskstar array
- Not much difference in burst rate or CPU usage
Hitachi Deskstar 400GB (7,200 RPM) RAID-0 800GB Array