damonposey
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,320
Uhh... isn't that the definition of capitalism? We all have the right to drive a company out of business by not buying its products. We are not pirates, we just want a game. Piracy is not our issue, it's the company's. If their implementations to reduce piracy start affecting a consumer's ability to play the game, and the consumer decides not to purchase anything else from that company, then that is how it should be.
You miss my point entirely. My point is that it's not right to justify piracy by determining an arbitrary point at which a company stops deserving money for their product. That's not anyones call to make.
A pop artist is making millions on a record, and people justify pirating their album because they deem 'they have enough money, so its okay'. But they have no right to make that statement. How would you feel if some seedy organization determined that 90% of your current paycheck is 'good enough', and they take that 10% from you? I mean it must be right since THEY deemed it right. Give me a break and wake up.