The 'new' G92 GTS is probably going to beat the 'new' GT.

That just means their statement is now not including the HD Video playback, on an unreleased product.

On the G92 GTS is anyones guess. Probably will be excellent.

It will be updated again apon release I bet.....

How to identify the difference.
OLD 8800 GTS (320MB or 640MB)
NEW 8800 GTS (512MB or 1024MB)
 
So they make the 8800GT, then we will get the revised 8800GTS, what about the updated 8800Ultra with like 1gb memory and clocked allot faster, i want to see that baby
 
Actually, the 8800GT comes in 256/512meg flavors :) Eventually you'll see 1 gigbyte versions of tghis, bjut not quite yet.
 
That just means their statement is now not including the HD Video playback, on an unreleased product.

On the G92 GTS is anyones guess. Probably will be excellent.

It will be updated again apon release I bet.....

How to identify the difference.
OLD 8800 GTS (320MB or 640MB)
NEW 8800 GTS (512MB or 1024MB)

OLD 8800 GTS 320mb or 640mb, 96 Shader processors
Just released 8800 GTS 640mb, G80 based with 112 shader processors
G92 with 128 shader processors, 256bit bus and 512/1024 mb ram probably won't be named 8800GTS
 
After going all fubar on the Naming Nvidia should make an official statement otherwise people will be waiting for the 8800 GTS G90 with 256sp 2Gig memory.

Haha too funny! :D

I totally agree with the naming... G92 should have at least been the 8900 series.

G92 with 128 shader processors, 256bit bus and 512/1024 mb ram probably won't be named 8800GTS

8800GTO maybe? They still haven't used that yet!
 
Actually, the 8800GT comes in 256/512meg flavors :) Eventually you'll see 1 gigbyte versions of tghis, bjut not quite yet.

No, 1GB will be on the new GTS model, whatever it's called. It'll come in 512MB and 1024MB models, just as the GT comes in 512MB and will eventually offer a (rather pointless) 256MB model.

256MB being rather pointless because anyone doing DX10 gaming (or even any remotely recent DX9 game on High settings, needs a 512MB card.
 
No, 1GB will be on the new GTS model, whatever it's called. It'll come in 512MB and 1024MB models, just as the GT comes in 512MB and will eventually offer a (rather pointless) 256MB model.

256MB being rather pointless because anyone doing DX10 gaming (or even any remotely recent DX9 game on High settings, needs a 512MB card.
what are you saying no for? the GT is supposed to eventually have 256mb and also a 1gb variant. Im not saying that the 1GB 8800GT will ever happen but has been mentioned on more than one occasion before there was ever even a rumor of the G92 8800GTS. ;)
 
I am hoping the new cards catch allot of people by supries, on how fast they really are.

I think the new GT did.

Good for the consumer.
 
We've already seen the "new" GTS and it turned out to be nothing more than a quick cash-in on the part of a few manufacturers, then the out-of-context snippet about a 512 MB GTS that people took as confirmation of a G92 GTS was changed, so why do people still persist in the belief that there's going to be a G92 8800 GTS? It makes no sense and there's no evidence whatsoever in favor.
 
We've already seen the "new" GTS and it turned out to be nothing more than a quick cash-in on the part of a few manufacturers, then the out-of-context snippet about a 512 MB GTS that people took as confirmation of a G92 GTS was changed, so why do people still persist in the belief that there's going to be a G92 8800 GTS? It makes no sense and there's no evidence whatsoever in favor.
read the thread since there appears to be more than ONE source saying the G92 GTS is a real possibility. Dailytech, for example, doesnt just make up crap.


Yet NVIDIA isn't done yet. A G92-derivative will appear later this year with even more shader units. According to company guidance, the new G92 will launch in early December and feature 128 shader units as opposed to the 112 featured on GeForce 8800 GT.


http://www.dailytech.com/But+Wait+Theres+More+NVIDIA+G92+for+2007/article9474.htm
 
nVidia releasing more G92 cards would not be surprising since there will be a lot of cards manufactured that beat 8800 GT spec and it would be a waste not to bin them as a higher card. But if they call it 8800 GTS, I'll be very surprised.
 
Maybe they should call a higher clock 128 shader G92 the 8850GT - after all there was a 7900GT and a faster 7950GT.

The real question is whether you're better off waiting for 8800GT prices to drop just a bit after mass availability and getting 2 X 8800GT cards instead of one high performance variant.
 
Back
Top