The Last Remnant Benchmark

T

trinibwoy

2[H]4U
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
2,090
If you want something new to test, tweak or play around with....

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/44360/The-Last-Remnant-PC-Benchmarker-Released

Minimum Required System Specification

OS: Windows XP SP2 or Windows Vista SP1
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo (2GHz) or AMD Athlon X2 (2GHz)
RAM: 1.5GB
Hard Drive: 15GB Free Space
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 8600 256MB

Recommended System Specification

OS: Windows Vista SP1
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo (2.4GHz) or AMD Athlon X2 (2.4GHz)
RAM: 2GB
Hard Drive: 15GB Free Space
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 8800 512MB


Download link - http://dl.square-enix.co.jp/remnant/jp/TheLastRemnantBenchmark.zip
 
System: Vista x64, E6600, 4GB, 9600GT
Res: 1280x720 window
Score: 65.57

The cinematics could be better, but it looks nice and if it's good I might get it.
 
55fps with vsync, 69fps without.
Looks pretty, but I doubt I'll play it.
 
Vista 64-bit, GTX 285, 2560x1600 4x16x

69.76 fps. It was tearing like crazy though.
 
Not a bad benchmarking device, definitely more real-world than 3dMark.

1280x720 windowed: 94.44 FPS.
1920x1080 fullscreen: 57.03 FPS.

System in sig.
 
vista x64 sp1
q6600 @ 3.4
8800 GTX stock

1920x1200: 59.55 fps no vsync
 
Windows 7 64bit
i920 @ 3.20GHz
3GB ddr-d 1333MHz
BFG GTX 260 OC

1920X1200: 66.91
 
Vista Ultimate 64bit
1900x1200 fullscreen
2x HD4850
CCC - quality
vsync: 59.98
 
Specs in sig. Ran on XP

58.83. I assume vSync was off by default as it was hitting in the 80s at times.
 
rig in sig. 1920x1080 87.23 fps


why am I scoring so much higher than those with faster setups? it obvious for the ATI X2 guys that this bench is only using one of your gpus but still Im getting much beter than the 4870 and and other gtx260 owners. :confused:
 
cannondale06 said:
rig in sig. 1920x1080 87.23 fps


why am I scoring so much higher than those with faster setups? it obvious for the ATI X2 guys that this bench is only using one of your gpus but still Im getting much beter than the 4870 and and other gtx260 owners. :confused:
Click to expand...
It's because of your ASUS Lightscribe. It boosts performance.
 
cannondale06 said:
rig in sig. 1920x1080 87.23 fps


why am I scoring so much higher than those with faster setups? it obvious for the ATI X2 guys that this bench is only using one of your gpus but still Im getting much beter than the 4870 and and other gtx260 owners. :confused:
Click to expand...

yea, ill have to test this later, ill disable 1 of my cards, and see what kind of scores I get. I didnt even think of that, but it does seem right.
 
Xenozx said:
yea, ill have to test this later, ill disable 1 of my cards, and see what kind of scores I get. I didnt even think of that, but it does seem right.
Click to expand...

There's nothing to test: Crossfire doesn't work unless the drivers have a specific profile for the game. It's very doubtful ATi included a Crossfire profile for this benchmark in the Cat 9.1s.
 
94.77 at 1920 by 1200 here, and its still choppy. I wonder if they will have a smother game when its finished. there was a section that my FPS dropped down to 40 but most was over a hundred. looks like they have some tweaking to do.

did I miss something here or is their a way to increase the eye candy?
 
Valset said:
94.77 at 1920 by 1200 here, and its still choppy. I wonder if they will have a smother game when its finished. there was a section that my FPS dropped down to 40 but most was over a hundred. looks like they have some tweaking to do.

did I miss something here or is their a way to increase the eye candy?
Click to expand...

One the 360 the game had moments where it was slowed down intentionally to give it a more "cinematic feel" or something like that. I assume its the same on the PC version.
 
Derangel said:
One the 360 the game had moments where it was slowed down intentionally to give it a more "cinematic feel" or something like that. I assume its the same on the PC version.
Click to expand...
there are quite a few stutters even at really high framerates and I think thats what he is referring too.
 
cannondale06 said:
there are quite a few stutters even at really high framerates and I think thats what he is referring too.
Click to expand...

that is a better description maybe. it didn't feel smooth at all even at 130 FPS. then at the part with the overdone gun it dropped down to 40 FPS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top