smileyscout
Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2005
- Messages
- 631
Last fall at work I read a issue of PC World someone had kindly left and they had an article which reviewed various anti-spyware programs on Windows Vista. Normally I consider reviews like this in computer magazines to be a tad bit colored by advertisers but it said the testing was done by a third party.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136205/article.html#
The actual magazine article was quite a bit more detailed.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/136196-1/article.html
According to this link they sure don't think much of Spybot anymore.
In short the article scored the old standby Spybot Search and Destroy at the bottom of the pack and PC Tools' Spyware Doctor 5.0 as the best. Has Spybot really become outdated? Do I really need to spend money to get good spyware protection? If PC Tools is really so much better I might start recommending it even though it isn't free.
I checked the spyware premier thread in the sticky but the last major update was in 2006.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136205/article.html#
The actual magazine article was quite a bit more detailed.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/136196-1/article.html
According to this link they sure don't think much of Spybot anymore.
In short the article scored the old standby Spybot Search and Destroy at the bottom of the pack and PC Tools' Spyware Doctor 5.0 as the best. Has Spybot really become outdated? Do I really need to spend money to get good spyware protection? If PC Tools is really so much better I might start recommending it even though it isn't free.
I checked the spyware premier thread in the sticky but the last major update was in 2006.