Here is what I'm excited about. We can agree the 260 is faster than the 4850 and somewhere close to the 4870. Seems to me nvidia just filled the gap. It has 95 percent performance of a 4870 or so but with a lower price tag. I wish it wasn't mir but if the card drops to 249 I might bite. It fills the gap between the 4850 and 4870. I want 280 prices to be around 400.
I've read a few reviews that say the GTX 260 is faster. Is it possible that all the ATi hoopla lately has all of sudden made HD 4870 faster in everyone's eyes? Is there any definitive proof that the HD 4870 is clearly faster?
Here, the GTX 260 is faster @ 1680 x 1050 4AA 16AF Quake Wars...
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2321639,00.asp
But here the GTX 260 is much slower at the same res. and settings....
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/14990/11
Both reviews use the same exact CPU at the same speed.
I can use 6 or 7 different reviews and show how one site says the 260 is faster while another site says the HD 4870 is faster. High-res. low-res. AA enabled or not.
I'd be all-in for the 260 for $260 if I could sort out which one is clearly faster...