• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Team 32# trying to close the gap

K

Kendrak

[H]ard|DCer of the Year 2009
Joined
Aug 29, 2001
Messages
21,141
They are pulling 1,225,643 per day compared to our 1,337,630.

Still a gap, but if you have any toasters that you can install linux and get FAH working we need to keep that gap so there is no question that we will be the #1 team!


 
Watch me prepare a farm of toasters by the end of april to distance ourselves from them :)

 
Competition is always good news. :)
 
Its more like 1.1 million, they still have that big 1.6M day from the recredits skewing the average.

 
relic said:
Competition is always good news. :)
Click to expand...

QFT. Makes for more overall production from everyone, thus increasing the amount of data we process for Stanford.....and we all know what that can lead to....:cool:

Fold On!!!

 
What is all this "D" people keep mentioning, if it's not a stupid question?
 
As relic and Axdrenalin stated, competition is very good for all teams concerned, but especially for Stanford. We should all hope for more of it and return to the days when this team earned great [H]onor on the fields of.glory.

In any case, there could actually be some real competition ahead. Woods from OC.com may finally have a resolution for his networking issues and another big producer, Flexy has many more machines untapped if this works. If it doesn't work, perhaps someone here with [H]ard networking knowledge can lend a hand?

 
I've got to the final testing stage of half my new farm.
I should get 62 Ghz online tomorrow.

Luck ....... :D
 
Tigerbiten said:
I've got to the final testing stage of half my new farm.
I should get 62 Ghz online tomorrow.

Luck ....... :D
Click to expand...

Wow :eek: That's impressive, keep on keepin' on. :D

I've borged my toaster, my cat, and "if Gods willin' and the creek don't rise" (I live on the 7th floor) I'll finally get a quad :p

Luck, luck and a little more good luck with 62 more gigawizz. :rolleyes:

 
digital_exhaust said:
Um... wow.

What kind of ppd do you expect to get out of your farm with that included?
Click to expand...

If I do not get p2619 then I'm looking at around 330 PpDpGhz.
62 x 330 = ~20k PpD.
Once I get the other five boxen rebuild, I hope to have ~140 Ghz online.
140 x 330 = ~46k PpD.
I'll still have a WRat on my tail but he wont be catching up so fast.

If I get p2619 then cut the numbers in half .......... :mad:

If you want to overtake me easily do it very soon ............. :p

Luck ............. :D

 
Damn... that is truly impressive man.... Those are some big numbers.

Inspirational to say the least... now I just need a raise, and maybe that inspiration can turn into something material:)

 
Tigerbiten said:
If you want to overtake me easily do it very soon ............. :p

Luck ............. :D

Click to expand...

Yea, we'll get right on that.... we just need to come up with 8 million points and 27 quads :eek: :)

That is some serious D We are seeing a lot of ramping up around here recently.

 
Well if my Q9450 comes in or doesn't I'll get a Q6600 when they drop to about 160-170...

Maybe even two!!!

The answer is always D, and stability!
 
Sunin said:
Well if my Q9450 comes in or doesn't I'll get a Q6600 when they drop to about 160-170...

Maybe even two!!!

The answer is always D, and stability!
Click to expand...

I've swopped out my E6600's for Q6600's.
Its the 100% stability thats been hard to find.
Was hopeing for 400x8 for 3.2 Ghz with a 3:2 memory multi but not 100% stable unless I upped the vcore over 0.125v.
But that raised the temps to much.
At that speed they where failing dual Orthos in the 6-18 hour range.

Dropped them down to 345x9 for 3.1 Ghz with a 5:4 memory multi. Running 100% stable so far at +0.1v vcore.
That overclocks the Memory a little but they are all Memtest86+ error free.
Now they are all at 18 hours dual Orthos Gromac's stress test without an error.
If they areerror free in the morning then its install the VM's and start folding.

Luck ........... :D
 
Tigerbiten said:
I've swopped out my E6600's for Q6600's.
Its the 100% stability thats been hard to find.

Dropped them down to 345x9 for 3.1 Ghz with a 5:4 memory multi. Running 100% stable so far at +0.1v vcore.
That overclocks the Memory a little but they are all Memtest86+ error free.
Now they are all at 18 hours dual Orthos Gromac's stress test without an error.
If they areerror free in the morning then its install the VM's and start folding.

Luck ........... :D
Click to expand...

What temps are you seeing with that multiplier / memory divider combination Tiger?


 
Tigerbiten said:
I've swopped out my E6600's for Q6600's.
Its the 100% stability thats been hard to find.
Was hopeing for 400x8 for 3.2 Ghz with a 3:2 memory multi but not 100% stable unless I upped the vcore over 0.125v.
But that raised the temps to much.
At that speed they where failing dual Orthos in the 6-18 hour range.

Dropped them down to 345x9 for 3.1 Ghz with a 5:4 memory multi. Running 100% stable so far at +0.1v vcore.
That overclocks the Memory a little but they are all Memtest86+ error free.
Now they are all at 18 hours dual Orthos Gromac's stress test without an error.
If they areerror free in the morning then its install the VM's and start folding.

Luck ........... :D
Click to expand...

Strange at is may seem neither Orthos or Prime are much good for stress testing these days.

This box will run forever over 3.6 on any stress test but it won’t fold until I drop to 3.4.

It seems Stanford has outdone themselves on these later SMP clients especially if you are running two side by side.

As for heat, after testing way too many coolers I would have to say that Thermalright is about the only company that can handle the higher volted CPUs as long as they are in a well ventilated case.

Grin, get neked and fold cool:cool:;)




 
Axdrenalin said:
What temps are you seeing with that multiplier / memory divider combination Tiger?
Click to expand...

Core Temps of between 50-60c over 20 cores.
The max Core Temp I'm happy with is 60c, because I need the headroom for when its get warm in the summer.
I've only got the Thermalright MST-9775 heatsinks, so with a TRUE I would get better temps.
The one mobo I'm testing ATM outside its box has one core temp showing 64c, but that will cool down once it goes in the case and gets better airflow over the heatsink.

Luck ............ :D
 
Yeah I have a few boxes like that... Stable 24/7 stress test to hell and back and no errors... I put on F@H x2 and within 8hrs the system reboots... so finding that balance between max OC and Max Stability is a fine line!

Those temps seem fine I would not worry too much. I assume your mobo has a Warning and Safety settings. I set mine to 70c warning 80c shutdown. So far no boxes have thrown warnings.



 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top