Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol.Better choice then same body.
Humans blink, can only see accurately in a small area at a time, and sneezing which causes you to have a small spasm and close your eyes. Everyone likes to think they are the most intelligent and best driver on the road and that in no way is there a computer that could beat them. This is just arrogance and insecurity. It really isn't about being smarter or faster than a human, it is about being more aware. Driving at night after a long day, a few too many drinks, anxiety can also mess with driving. I like the idea of a system that can see all around the car, and in a ideal situation, cars are mesh linked to work together. I do enjoy a nice day drive but hjonestly my back and forth to work drive every day I am fine handing that over to the ai while i get an extra hour of sleep lol.
So you are telling me AI is smart enough to realize the above picture is dangerous?
People really don't understand AI and who make statements about what it can do are well...uninformed
-Signed
-Someone who is teaching AI to others in class.
This guy is dead wrong. It's already here. A highway populated entirely with Teslas driving themselves at speed would see no accidents.
So you are telling me AI is smart enough to realize the above picture is dangerous?
People really don't understand AI and who make statements about what it can do are well...uninformed
-Signed
-Someone who is teaching AI to others in class.
This guy is dead wrong. It's already here. A highway populated entirely with Teslas driving themselves at speed would see no accidents.
I'm telling you that a human is more likely to miss a thousand other things about themselves that are more dangerous than ladder dumbass. For example, the effect of stress, being tired, having an argument with a spouse, thinking about other tasks you need to do, etc. All of those distract human drivers and make them less effective, and those factors are millions of times more common than encountering the dumbass with a ladder.So you are telling me AI is smart enough to realize the above picture is dangerous?
People really don't understand AI and who make statements about what it can do are well...uninformed
-Signed
-Someone who is teaching AI to others in class.
I'm telling you that a human is more likely to miss a thousand other things about themselves that are more dangerous than ladder dumbass. For example, the effect of stress, being tired, having an argument with a spouse, thinking about other tasks you need to do, etc. All of those distract human drivers and make them less effective, and those factors are millions of times more common than encountering the dumbass with a ladder.
So you are telling me AI is smart enough to realize the above picture is dangerous?
People really don't understand AI and who make statements about what it can do are well...uninformed
-Signed
-Someone who is teaching AI to others in class.
Why should the AI give a shit about some dumb ass hauling a ladder dangerously? You know why it wouldn't because it won't be fucking tailgating the guy like a lot of humans and being too close if something happens. It will be able to brake if something goes bad due to idiocy. I'm all for more testing but that is a stupid example.
Except the only way this tech works is if you are all in. Once you train drivers to turn off their brains and let the computer handle it they will not be prepared to take over when it's necessary. And country roads is exactly where you want this tech because highway hypnosis is worse on dark dirt-tracks in the snow. City people shouldn't need to drive at all, they have the bandwidth to go full telecommuting but governments never somehow want to commit to that even though it would be the greenest option. I wonder which vested interest is behind that?
I can get my head around self driving cars on the highway and other long distance roads where traffic moves and is relatively patterned/predictable. But put 20,000 AI cars at the football stadium all leaving at the same time and that's where I start to question if the logic can be perfected enough. I don't know if it can be programmed well enough to deal with all the little nuances that occur in tight traffic. Car broke down in the middle of the road, no shoulder available. Traffic lights burnt out, no police directing traffic. There are endless unpredictable scenarios.
Good luck with that.
So when the shitty worn out lane marking confuse it, well there might not be accidents,
I think they want to deal with some of what you bring up by using some kind of swarm logic and inter-vehicle communication networks (like ad-hoc). This is further down the road (heh), getting a system that can demonstrate independent control is first priority. There are a lot of issues with this of course, security being the big one. But I think a centrally coordinated traffic system has a lot of potential.
Until some hacker "fritzes" the network with bad data. Fords idea of inter car communication is just bad.
I thought of this as well. Nothing like an entire network of vehicles disabled due to a glitch or a hacker. Kind of like the entire fleet of Delta airlines being grounded last week due to a central computer problem.
I also don't like the feeling of being a "drone" in my own vehicle. I mean, we're all going to sit there mindlessly, while our self driving cars whiz us along? I don't doubt the technology can be developed. But my skeptical/pessimistic personality thinks this is a bad idea overall.
I thought of this as well. Nothing like an entire network of vehicles disabled due to a glitch or a hacker. Kind of like the entire fleet of Delta airlines being grounded last week due to a central computer problem.
I also don't like the feeling of being a "drone" in my own vehicle. I mean, we're all going to sit there mindlessly, while our self driving cars whiz us along? I don't doubt the technology can be developed. But my skeptical/pessimistic personality thinks this is a bad idea overall.
Shitty lane markings confuse me - especially when it rains at night and they all but disappear. For some dumb ass reason Virginia doesn't believe in lane reflectors. And don't give me that snow plow BS - they are all over in Pennsylvania and Ohio; yet somehow they manage to maintain them despite getting WAY more snow than we do.
"Computers will never be smart enough to beat a chess master"
they only reason they were grounded was because they couldn't check passengers in, the planes could of flown without any issues. so that's a terrible comparison.
Chess is a bad example, it's just brute forcing millions of moves ahead and picking the best.
Some experts claimed around the 2000s that "It may be a hundred years before a computer beats humans at Go — maybe even longer", because Go wasn't affordable by brute-force approaches. And it was impossible... until an artificial intelligence did a pair of years ago. I.e. it happened about one order of magnitude faster than the prediction.
Go, not CS GO, lol.
There is is the difference though, Stephen Hawking did keep up, he still worked his art. Would Shockley have done the same? Perhaps he would since he came from a different time period than Woz, plus Shockley didn't exactly become a multi-millionaire since the parent company owned the patents for the work. And who knows maybe he would have been the "good company man" and work until retirement, then left on a pension.Right, dude's been dead for nearly 30 years, you think if he was still alive he would not have kept up? implying that someone that was a pioneer in a field can't figure shit out because he's old? wow. The ghost of Stephen Hawking would like a word with you sir.
I believe Cadillac had something with IR sensors to detect "warm things" at night and had an overlay on the window... or at least that was their huge tech demo a decade or more back... what happened to that?Judging by the number of dead deer and damaged cars, not many. But IMO, that is where Tesla and others have failed. Instead of jumping direct to 'Autopilot', why not start with IR sensors that can detect deer and others by the side of the road and project target markers on some kind of HUD and let the human figure it out.
You mean some guy whose's paycheck is dependent on everyone thinking AI is the next big thing vs. some retired millionaire who has no skin in the game, at least financially?I prefer to listen to today's actual experts in the AI field vs.some guy that retired many years ago on a pile of cash. And this is giving Woz all the kudos he deserves for his time at Apple.
You mean some guy whose's paycheck is dependent on everyone thinking AI is the next big thing vs. some retired millionaire who has no skin in the game, at least financially?
An interesting take on the matter. You could also argue the guy who has no skin in the game also isn't any more of an expert than literally anyone else who reads article online, at which point people are publishing what he's saying (and people listening) as some undeniable "truth" ... why because he's rich?You mean some guy whose's paycheck is dependent on everyone thinking AI is the next big thing vs. some retired millionaire who has no skin in the game, at least financially?