![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
-
Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
SSD + Pagefile
- Thread starter bitsu
- Start date
SicKlown42012
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,319
Agreed. Since the data in a pagefile is mainly small random writes/reads, a SSD will be ideal. The limited writes of a SSD won't be an issue, unless you move 10GBs or more a day.
You don't mention your OS, but if it's Vista/7, this MSDN blog can give you some more insight.
http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/05/05/support-and-q-a-for-solid-state-drives-and.aspx
You don't mention your OS, but if it's Vista/7, this MSDN blog can give you some more insight.
http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/05/05/support-and-q-a-for-solid-state-drives-and.aspx
SicKlown42012
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,319
The fastest and probably least time consuming option is to just let Windows handle the page file. It'll stay on the C: drive, and will be sized based upon need. The limited writing capability of a SSD shouldn't be a concern for 99% of home users. The amount of data that you have to move in order to use all of the write cycles is mind boggling.
dugn
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
- Messages
- 398
Two points - set your page file to a set size. There are too many conflicting opinions to cover exactly what size here (I set mine to the Windows-recommended amount even though that's sometimes more than needed). But definitely set your page file size to a specific amount. This saves unnecessary reads/writes when Windows is managing it since Windows will shrink and expand its size as needed. You save a bit in the contraction/expansion by deliberately setting this to a specific size.
Also, don't fret about reads and writes chewing up the SSD over time. I see far too many people trying to insulate their SSD from unnecessary reads/writes and end up relegating many tasks (swap files, IE cache, heavily-used applications) to their HDDs making their OS much slower as a consequence. This effectively renders many of the speed advantages of the SSD moot.
As with any bleeding edge/new technology, SSDs are still in their infancy and more improvements in speed and reliability are yet to come. But if you can afford one, by all means, use it. Don't put it in a safe little bubble and rarely take full advantage of it.
Also, don't fret about reads and writes chewing up the SSD over time. I see far too many people trying to insulate their SSD from unnecessary reads/writes and end up relegating many tasks (swap files, IE cache, heavily-used applications) to their HDDs making their OS much slower as a consequence. This effectively renders many of the speed advantages of the SSD moot.
As with any bleeding edge/new technology, SSDs are still in their infancy and more improvements in speed and reliability are yet to come. But if you can afford one, by all means, use it. Don't put it in a safe little bubble and rarely take full advantage of it.
Last edited: