![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
specs and benchmarks for the R9 Fury (non x) ??
- Thread starter AndreRio
- Start date
I expect the Fury to simply be an air-cooled Fury X.... i.e. Fiji XT
I expect the Fury Nano and Fury Maxx(x2) to use a more energy effecient cut down version... i.e. Fiji Pro
I speculate this because AMD has only announced Fiji XT and Fiji Pro, no other variations.
That said, a $550 air cooled TitanX/980ti beater would blow the market wide open. I think they are waiting to release the 'regular' Fury after the Fury X for 2 reasons: 1) to sell more W/C units 2) to get them reviewed benchmarked with bigger OCs first.
I expect the Fury Nano and Fury Maxx(x2) to use a more energy effecient cut down version... i.e. Fiji Pro
I speculate this because AMD has only announced Fiji XT and Fiji Pro, no other variations.
That said, a $550 air cooled TitanX/980ti beater would blow the market wide open. I think they are waiting to release the 'regular' Fury after the Fury X for 2 reasons: 1) to sell more W/C units 2) to get them reviewed benchmarked with bigger OCs first.
Last edited:
Everyone talks about how AMD is going to fail or succeed based on how Fury X does vs Nvidia, but the reality is those high end cards don't make up most of the video card sales. The Fury Nano if priced near the 980 or 970 comes out with equal or better performance, I see large amount of sales for that card killing nvidia on the midrange price/performance/watt/noise/etc and forcing price drops.
Last edited: