Non-profit R&D through gov't organizations.Yes, how else do you pay for inovation/devellopment/failure learning ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Non-profit R&D through gov't organizations.Yes, how else do you pay for inovation/devellopment/failure learning ?
I’ll keep it simple, look up darpa innovations starting with Ethernet.You lost me at gov't.
I’ll keep it simple, look up darpa innovations starting with Ethernet.
I’ll keep it simple, look up darpa innovations starting with Ethernet.
Stuff cost more during a war. Look at our gas prices.Talk about government waste, look at Phony Stark aka Elon KGB Musk;
https://www.thedailybeast.com/elon-...-war-to-squeeze-more-megabucks-from-pentagon/
Stuff cost more during a war. Look at our gas prices.
Why does that make him kgb? If anything the guy is the most important person on the planet as he keep pushing the envelope.
I could care less if the USA pays a bit more and Elon one day gets we as a species off this rock
Like Musk or any other capitalist innovator is. They all do it for the good of mankind. LoLYeah, because DARPA is soooooo altruistic.
Bet 300k a year doesn't even get you the accounting budget to hire the janitorial staffPlus I think the government creating their own Starlink alternative would somehow cost more than the *300k* a year they're paying SpaceX that's highlighted.
Like Musk or any other capitalist innovator is. They all do it for the good of mankind. LoL
Space x has launched more rockets this year then everyone else put together. They have to be doing something right.The whole Mars or bust thing with Musk was total BS. Was never realistic whatsoever. He's since switched to the Moon base which is far more doable.
The dude's a total shyster and con-man like pedophile traitor Trump. Not someone to look up to, someone to deport actually.
But hey I don't drink the Kool-aid, so call me crazy. LOL
I'm 100% behind Space exploration, big fan of the Apollo era stuff and NASA astronauts, etc...
But as a species would love to see humans working together as one; China + Russia + U.S. plus Euro Space agency all on the same team and working together to truly get us "out there" first the Moon and a base, then humans on Mars, then a city on the Moon, then a base on Mars, and then to the moons of Jupiter and beyond.
I don’t. My point is that non profit r&d is cheaper than private r&d due to the profit rolled into it.No, but you're naive to believe that DARPA does.
Well the dod has started using starshield (starlink) and its significantly cheaper and easier to setup and use than the older geo sats they have been using.SpaceX has the most contracts with the gov of any rocket/space company - and even aerospace companies if you negate non-space stuff for the aerospace companies like jets and tanks and missiles etc - because they have the experience/capability, more than all the others to produce results in space at the best $ cost
The whole Mars or bust thing with Musk was total BS. Was never realistic whatsoever. He's since switched to the Moon base which is far more doable.
The dude's a total shyster and con-man like pedophile traitor Trump. Not someone to look up to, someone to deport actually.
But hey I don't drink the Kool-aid, so call me crazy. LOL
I too have opinions about a lot of people. Probably people you would categorize as "good people".I hate the man. I can like the work that his companies are doing in terms of space launches and still hate the man. He's an asshole. Making lots of money and building some cool shit doesn't stop him being an asshole.
I too have opinions about a lot of people. Probably people you would categorize as "good people".
But I always try and assume that people have good intentions and we can have reasonable debates.
I feel the trend of either "dehumanizing" people we disagree with or even approaching that is a real problem.
(not saying that's what you're doing but it feels in the same vein).
Wealthy people are most certainly not exclusively assholes nor is there any data that supports anything you're saying.I'm not dehumanizing him at all. I'm saying he's an asshole because of his behaviour, not his wealth or his business ventures. It you take into account how he treated his kids, his workers, the general public, how he throws tantrums when someone makes fun of him, the whole episode of DOGE. Everything points to an asshole of a human being. He's not a nice guy. Steve Jobs was the same thing. He might have been right about a lot of things but he wasn't a nice guy. He was an asshole. A smart asshole but still an asshole in how he treated people.
Unfortunately, when it comes to extremely wealthy people you tend to get a lot of assholes rising to the top. They do whatever it takes to make more money and don't much care about the collateral damage along the way. Maybe there is value to society about the system that allows them to reach the dizzying heights of wealth but it doesn't change the fact that assholes do rise to the top in the system we have right now. It is very rare for these people to have a lot of humanity and a lot of caring about the people that work for them.
Elon launching(and catching) Skyscrapers, yet here are his competitors.
Not a disservice to the IPO.
https://x.com/i/status/2060165505541968248
View attachment 806103
View attachment 806104
Of course, but with Nasa's announcement just a couple days ago, and this setback likely being massive for Blue Origin, NASA already stated they are re-evaluating for Artemis and other launch missions. This is not just a few weeks setback, but likely 12mo+. Rocketlabs and/or SpaceX will likely be beneficiaries of this.Everyone has launch failures, including SpaceX. Are they behind? Yes, but a failure is not an indication that they won't catch up. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Who the heck knows at this stage. Either way, we should want people to catch up to SpaceX so companies have more options and we don't end up with a space monopoly.
I have friends that work at both places and im rooting for them both because I agree with you here.Everyone has launch failures, including SpaceX. Are they behind? Yes, but a failure is not an indication that they won't catch up. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Who the heck knows at this stage. Either way, we should want people to catch up to SpaceX so companies have more options and we don't end up with a space monopoly.
Thats completely backwards. Private companies focus a lot more on saving money, whereas public research just raise the taxes. SpaceXs rockets cost a fraction of what the publicly funded rockets does. They can ship a kilo to space for a tenth of the competition. Starship will lower the pricw by another factor of 10.I don’t. My point is that non profit r&d is cheaper than private r&d due to the profit rolled into it.
You would think this is in the realm "no shit Sherlock" but for some reason people think govnt is the answer, sure if money is free from the taxpayers. SpaceX has saved the govnt billions in cost per launch not to mention many other things. SpaceX has left NASA in the dust, cost, innovation, speed of launch, new tech not to mention SpaceX is more nimble and not bogged down in bureaucracy that the govnt is the best at.Thats completely backwards. Private companies focus a lot more on saving money, whereas public research just raise the taxes. SpaceXs rockets cost a fraction of what the publicly funded rockets does. They can ship a kilo to space for a tenth of the competition. Starship will lower the pricw by another factor of 10.
Go for it.
projected $1.75 trillion to $2 trillion valuation as "mathematically indefensible" for a company that posted a $4.9 billion loss on $18.7 billion revenue in 2025
This aged well /sBlue origin will likely put humans on the moon before spaces does I think. I still tune into spacex starship launches, but only to see the failures in real time.
The drugs?Back on topic I used to be a huge Elon Musk fan pre-covid
Back around 2017-2018. He was talking some really cool stuff about creating a Starfleet type, Star Trek movement, getting humans to Mars and out exploring space. And really pushing technology. Cool stuff.
But then something changed in him and he got really weird and strange during covid and the last couple years. He's not the same person he was back then and rarely even talks about all this cool space stuff like it used to.
Almost like Howard Hughes late in life He got really fucking strange and lost it.
I don’t. My point is that non profit r&d is cheaper than private r&d due to the profit rolled into it.