• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Some 4870x2 user benchmarks (canned)

Chris_B

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
May 29, 2001
Messages
5,485
System

q6600@3.6
maximus formula mobo
vista 64
4 gig ram


Company of heroes, 1920x1200 dx10 max settings 8xfsaa

coh3870.jpg


coh4870.jpg


Call of juarez dx10 benchmark, max settings 1920x1200 (shadowmaps 1024x1024) msaa 4x

coj3870.jpg


coj4870.jpg



Pt boats knights of the sea dx10 benchmark 1920x1200 max settings 8xfsaa

pt3870.jpg


pt4870.jpg



World in conflict demo dx10 max settings 1920x1200 4xfsaa (water reflecting clouds enabled)


wic3870.jpg


wic4870.jpg


Devil may cry benchamrk, dx10 1600x1200 max settings 8xfsaa

dmc3870.jpg


dmc4870.jpg


Crysis dx9 1920x1200 high settings (no fsaa)

cry3870-dx9.jpg


cry4870-dx9.jpg



Crysis dx10 very high settings (no fsaa)

cry3870dx10.jpg


cry4870dx10.jpg


And lastly a pic of the old and the new

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/bench/radeons.jpg
 
Some very interesting results to say the least. Thanks for the info! I was looking for a nice, easy comparison like this.
 
Doesnt tell the whole story though, id wait for the hardocp review before making any judgements :)
 
Doesnt tell the whole story though, id wait for the hardocp review before making any judgements :)

Nothing does ;)

This is a very nice user review. I like them in general because I like their simplicity and the fact that it is using a "real user's" system\environment.

Thanks for taking the time to share.
 
I would have thought the minimum fps in CoJ would have improved more than that over the 3870x2. going to 21fps from 16 still seems a little low especially compared to most of the other numbers. :confused:
 
Ahh interestin results.

I have a question though - I am getting around 5-10 fps lower than you in crysis under the same benchmarking conditions. I have a brand new Sapphire 4870x2, installed the drivers that came on the CD. I have a Q9450 @ 3.0ghz.

Now I'm worried i'm not gettin the performance I should be (always a paranoia of mine with new hardware). Is there any way to run some tests to see if I'm gettin what I should? How do I tell if both Gpu's are under load?

thanks
 
Ahh interestin results.

I have a question though - I am getting around 5-10 fps lower than you in crysis under the same benchmarking conditions. I have a brand new Sapphire 4870x2, installed the drivers that came on the CD. I have a Q9450 @ 3.0ghz.

Now I'm worried i'm not gettin the performance I should be (always a paranoia of mine with new hardware). Is there any way to run some tests to see if I'm gettin what I should? How do I tell if both Gpu's are under load?

thanks

it could be due to the fact his c2q is 600mhz faster than yours
 
it could be due to the fact his c2q is 600mhz faster than yours

Ahh that is the most obvious difference. I just assumed the CPU wouldn't be the bottlenecking factor.. guess I could very well be wrong.. at least at these settings
 
CPU could definitely be (and most likely is) the bottleneck in this case.
 
Back
Top