Software vs. Bios OCing

NulloModo

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Messages
4,602
Heya,

I looked around the first few pages, and hadn't seen this question asked, so I figured it was safe.

I haven't been in the OC scene in a while. I picked up my P4 Northwood 2.4 about 3 years ago (eh, something like that) and got it up to 2.7, but that is high as it would go. At that time, you could only OC through the Bios, so that is what I did.

Now, apparently from what I am seeing, there are windows programs you can download that let you OC while still running the OS and whatnot (like ClockGen).

How do the two compare? Is the software approach as stable as the hardware? Is there less of a chance of fubaring your comp. and having to clear CMOS with either one? Do the software solutions autimatically crank it up to the rated speed on bootup, or are there some safety features that will take it back to stock if your system doesn't want to boot at that speed?

What do most of you use?
 
From my own personal experience, you Overclock in the Bios to get a completely stable system. Any overclocking done while in Windows (with any number of programs such as uGuru, etc) can cause instability or hard system crashes.

The only plus side to Windows Overclocking programs, is that you never have to monkey with the BIOS if something goes wrong (as the default info is still in the BIOS upon reboot).
 
Back
Top