• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

SMM Privilege Escalation Exploit on Intel CPUs

plasma

Gawd
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
647
I saw this on slashdot today


http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/19/179228


Here's the paper which was released today

http://invisiblethingslab.com/itl/Resources.html


Scary times:eek: Security researchers Joanna Rutkowska (the bluepill hypervisor woman) and Loic Duflotfound found a new way to basically install a rooktkit into the SMM memory space of the BIOS making it completely hidden from the OS, bootCDs etc and almost impossible to remove.

the good news is I think they need physical access to the machine, and it's a new exploit which will hopefull be patched before it allow any damage

The attack presented in the paper has been fixed on some systems according to Intel. We have however found out that even the relatively new boards, like e.g. Intel DQ35 are still vulnerable (the very recent Intel DQ45 doesn't seem to be vulnerable though). The exploit attached is for DQ35 board — the offsets would have to be changed to work on other boards (please do not ask how to do this).

http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2009/03/attacking-smm-memory-via-intel-cpu.html
 
It's much more limited in scope than the sensational original article (not linked above) made it sound. Anyways, it first requires a successful ring 0 attack, at which point you're hacked anyways.

edit: from the ars article:
Truthfully, there's precious little reason to panic, particularly given the fact that Invisible Things believes an attacker would need a great deal of time and in-depth information on a particular system configuration in order to launch the type of attack described above. For all the furor surrounding the idea of a chip or chipset-level vulnerability, the chances of a general exploit going wild is virtually nil. General exploits thrive on commonalities; Rutkowska's SMM assault requires extreme specificity.

You just might want to stay away from the Intel DQ35 board if you're in the position to run unknown kernel level code in a virtualization environment. :p
 
Back
Top