CombatChrisNC
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,140
So here's the setup.
I've got an old (1366 socket) 1U 2-proc IBM server fitted out with a single 2.9ghz quad core and 64GB of RAM. I've got a pair of 74GB SAS drives (don't remember if 10k or 15k) set up in RAID0.
RAID0 because 74GB isn't enough for me to have (as it is now) a 2008R2 install with some Steam games on it, acting as a LAN server.
I'm going to rebuild the device from being a bare-metal 2008R2 into a ESX 6 host with a 2012r2 VM.
So here's what I'm trying to accomplish.
Goal 1: Size. 148GB is my current capacity, so no back-sliding from there.
Goal 2: Reliability. RAID0 presently, with no real backup plan. I know I can schedule a backup process for my game files, but I would like to have RAID1 or RAID5 so I have one more buffer in place before having to restore from backup.
Goal 3: Speed. It's not exactly a slouch right now, but it's not greased lightning either. I'm used to my gaming desktop which has a paid of SSD's in RAID0. I certainly don't want anything slower than it is.
Goal 4: Price. Things are tight, so it's hard to justify much for a pleasure-server which only hosts some games I get to play 2-3 times a week. $100 absolute cap.
So, here are my options.
Option 1: Pair of ~128GB SSD's in RAID1. Hits most of the goals, minus size. A little back-sliding...
Option 2: 2 (or 3) 300GB SAS 10Ks. Set up in RAID1 or RAID5, it would hit most goals, but would likely be a little slower than the current RAID0.
Option 3: 6 146GB SAS 10Ks. Set up in RAID5. It gets me the most size, and I imagine likely faster than a 3-disk option 2.
Option 4: Biggest single SSD I can get within budget. No RAID, but is the most simple setup. Not faster than RAID1 for reads, but still quick.
NON POLL OPTION: 6 disk RAID10. Lets up to 3 disks fail, and more IO than a RAID5. Only hit is space, but I still am 400+GB.
Thoughts?
These are the drives I'm looking at BTW:
HP 146GB 10K 2.5"SAS DRIVE 431958-B21 431954-003 *NEW*
HP 300GB 10K 2.5"6G SAS DRIVE 507127-B21 ST9300603SS NEW
I shouldn't expect any issues using the 'HP' drives in an IBM host, no?
I've got an old (1366 socket) 1U 2-proc IBM server fitted out with a single 2.9ghz quad core and 64GB of RAM. I've got a pair of 74GB SAS drives (don't remember if 10k or 15k) set up in RAID0.
RAID0 because 74GB isn't enough for me to have (as it is now) a 2008R2 install with some Steam games on it, acting as a LAN server.
I'm going to rebuild the device from being a bare-metal 2008R2 into a ESX 6 host with a 2012r2 VM.
So here's what I'm trying to accomplish.
Goal 1: Size. 148GB is my current capacity, so no back-sliding from there.
Goal 2: Reliability. RAID0 presently, with no real backup plan. I know I can schedule a backup process for my game files, but I would like to have RAID1 or RAID5 so I have one more buffer in place before having to restore from backup.
Goal 3: Speed. It's not exactly a slouch right now, but it's not greased lightning either. I'm used to my gaming desktop which has a paid of SSD's in RAID0. I certainly don't want anything slower than it is.
Goal 4: Price. Things are tight, so it's hard to justify much for a pleasure-server which only hosts some games I get to play 2-3 times a week. $100 absolute cap.
So, here are my options.
Option 1: Pair of ~128GB SSD's in RAID1. Hits most of the goals, minus size. A little back-sliding...
Option 2: 2 (or 3) 300GB SAS 10Ks. Set up in RAID1 or RAID5, it would hit most goals, but would likely be a little slower than the current RAID0.
Option 3: 6 146GB SAS 10Ks. Set up in RAID5. It gets me the most size, and I imagine likely faster than a 3-disk option 2.
Option 4: Biggest single SSD I can get within budget. No RAID, but is the most simple setup. Not faster than RAID1 for reads, but still quick.
NON POLL OPTION: 6 disk RAID10. Lets up to 3 disks fail, and more IO than a RAID5. Only hit is space, but I still am 400+GB.
Thoughts?
These are the drives I'm looking at BTW:
HP 146GB 10K 2.5"SAS DRIVE 431958-B21 431954-003 *NEW*
HP 300GB 10K 2.5"6G SAS DRIVE 507127-B21 ST9300603SS NEW
I shouldn't expect any issues using the 'HP' drives in an IBM host, no?
Last edited:
As an eBay Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.