e6400 running at 8x450=3600
buffalo firestix 2x1gb d9gmh rated 800 5-5-5-15 2.1v
running at 1:1 450 5-5-5-15 2.3v
passes memtest 24hrs. tested test5 3 hours.
passes orthos small fft for 27 hours at 1.44v actual load voltage
however, system is more or less unstable. 3dmark will eventually bsod. programs randomly terminate.
large fft crashes after 2 hours.
If I pull vcore up to 1.455 min under load, it'll pass large fft for 14 hours. I was thinking of stopping the test, but when I opened rivatuner, it crashed. programs still randomly terminate.
System works completely stable at 8x400=3200 with 1.3v load volts. Ram at 1:1 400 4-4-4-12 2.3v.
psu is a shitty ultra vpower 500w, but it does work completely stable at 3.2... 3.6 looks so close to being stable.
I once ran blend at 3.6, using 1.59v set volts (around 1.52v under load), and it passed 24 hours. However, system is still otherwise unstable, with random terminations and crashes.
psu blows extremely hot exhaust and a hint of burning. Think a better psu will get me stability at 3.6? Or is cpu just not willing to be stable at 3.6?
I've had two e6400's, one l630a and one l617a (f5 b1 engineering sample). Both are pretty similar behaving.
Load coretemp gets to 60'c peak at 1.455v with apogee block.
edit: so as title asks, is small fft enough to cover cpu stability? It runs forever stably...
buffalo firestix 2x1gb d9gmh rated 800 5-5-5-15 2.1v
running at 1:1 450 5-5-5-15 2.3v
passes memtest 24hrs. tested test5 3 hours.
passes orthos small fft for 27 hours at 1.44v actual load voltage
however, system is more or less unstable. 3dmark will eventually bsod. programs randomly terminate.
large fft crashes after 2 hours.
If I pull vcore up to 1.455 min under load, it'll pass large fft for 14 hours. I was thinking of stopping the test, but when I opened rivatuner, it crashed. programs still randomly terminate.
System works completely stable at 8x400=3200 with 1.3v load volts. Ram at 1:1 400 4-4-4-12 2.3v.
psu is a shitty ultra vpower 500w, but it does work completely stable at 3.2... 3.6 looks so close to being stable.
I once ran blend at 3.6, using 1.59v set volts (around 1.52v under load), and it passed 24 hours. However, system is still otherwise unstable, with random terminations and crashes.
psu blows extremely hot exhaust and a hint of burning. Think a better psu will get me stability at 3.6? Or is cpu just not willing to be stable at 3.6?
I've had two e6400's, one l630a and one l617a (f5 b1 engineering sample). Both are pretty similar behaving.
Load coretemp gets to 60'c peak at 1.455v with apogee block.
edit: so as title asks, is small fft enough to cover cpu stability? It runs forever stably...